As a former graduate student, I would like to make some suggestions on the review of mathematics for postgraduate entrance examination:
We must establish a correct learning attitude.
As we all know, learning can't be accelerated, but students are still tirelessly looking for shortcuts. I will tell you clearly today that there is no quick way to learn. Only efficient learning methods can make you take fewer detours and achieve the greatest results with the least time and energy. This is especially true in mathematics. Complicated concept theorems and flexible topics all determine that learning mathematics is a long-term process, which must be accompanied by correct and efficient learning methods in order to learn mathematics well in the year of postgraduate entrance examination and not delay the study of other disciplines.
The learning method itself is divided into many aspects: sitting posture, writing, the use of draft paper, knowledge understanding, answering questions, calculation, induction ... There is profound knowledge behind everything, and you can't expect to get fat overnight! It needs to be emphasized that the biggest learning methods are plans and tools, that is, time arrangement and teaching materials. The same thing was done. If the time is wrong, the effect will vary widely, and if the tools are wrong, it will be thankless.
time management
Students can see similar time plans in various places: basic (February-June), intensive (July-September), sprint (September-165438+ 10), composition (65438+February-exam).
In this way, the division of time nodes is reasonable in terms of time and learning volume, but it is only an ideal state. In practice, you have all kinds of things that delay your study time and personal learning ability. If you still study according to this time node, it will be devastating for you.
Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. What you have done in each stage, how well you have learned, how much time you have spent, and whether you can learn in the next step need a series of objective evaluations. There is never a fixed time plan, everything is based on your actual situation.
Learning tool
Learning tools are another important carrier to ensure learning efficiency! They all say to do the questions, but what questions do they do?
Some teachers pieced together the questions casually and made a topic source of 1000. Others felt that 1000 was not exciting enough and made a relay of 1800. Of course, there are 660 and 300 topics in the market ... some students bought a set of all the famous books and insisted on reading them (such students)
Every book on the market is very professional and comprehensive, but there is a serious problem-difficult problems and off-topic mixed together. Take solving problems as an example. Most of the books are real questions for the postgraduate entrance examination over the years. Many students do a lot of questions in the basic stage of review, forget the foundation, and wear off their interest in learning in a lot of difficult problems, making themselves more and more inefficient. When they start to do many problems in the intensive sprint stage, they start to rework the learning foundation, wasting time and energy.
Actually, it's totally unnecessary, math is not that good! A good learning tool should be divided into difficult and focused learning, such as listing a scientific course and practicing according to the matching exercise books and papers. Only learning, practicing and evaluating can be considered as a reasonable combination.
Learning evaluation-the ultimate link
Self-contempt will dampen the enthusiasm of learning and affect the progress of review; Self-assembly makes you feel tall, I don't know why, and it wastes your study time, so it is very important to know yourself correctly. Of course, you can't evaluate your study by yourself. Many students always say, "Teacher, I brushed XX x times, but …". What I particularly emphasize is that you should not judge whether your study is good or not by yourself, but should check whether you have mastered the knowledge you have learned before through test papers and simulation questions, and then the teacher will evaluate whether you can learn the next lesson well according to your mastery of knowledge. Only in this way can you have a correct understanding of yourself, slowly and steadily, and finally get high marks.
label
Everything is done in advance, and the postgraduate entrance examination is an endurance activity. I hope everyone will go all the way on the road to postgraduate entrance examination, and I wish everyone can see the rainbow after the storm!