Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - What's the difference between the basic articles of Li Yongle's complete works and the whole book?
What's the difference between the basic articles of Li Yongle's complete works and the whole book?
Difference:

Basic articles are for students who have never studied mathematics or have a particularly poor foundation.

Reviewing the whole book is a textbook that is highly compatible with the postgraduate entrance examination.

The teacher said in the lecture that if you buy their courses, you can give priority to the basic articles and counseling handouts.

If you don't buy their courses for self-study, it is recommended to review the whole book.

Background:

The whole book is based on the supporting counseling books for basic classes, the counseling handouts are supporting counseling books for intensive classes, and the whole book is a self-study book for basic+intensive classes. The foundation of the book 2 1 and 22/has been revised and cannot be confused with the old version such as the 20 th edition. Our understanding of the new edition comes from the seniors who took the 2 1 postgraduate entrance examination. Students who have the basis of the whole book version 2 1 and experience in using the whole book should also make more corrections.

The comprehensive promotion of the book in 22 years is the whole book, which has not changed much, so it is still called the whole book.

Zhang Jimin is the editor-in-chief of Book Review 20th Edition, which is a system with Book Review. The review book basically contains all the basic contents of the book, which can be seen in the basic course, and its capacity is about twice that of the book.

The foundation of the old version of the whole book is still relatively general, which can be applied to zero foundation or the early foundation of various schemes. It is suggested that students with poor foundation or early start do it, and then the foundation of the whole book is completed, which is equivalent to the consolidation of the second brush.

Wu Zhongxiang, the editor-in-chief of the 2 1 and 22/editions of the book, has made a great adaptation of the basis of the book, which is compatible with Wu Zhongxiang's basic courses, with obvious personal style, but slightly lost universality.

For students with poor integration ability, they will feel obviously different from the whole book system. If the planning is still based on Wu Zhongxiang's video, then the foundation of the whole book is "indispensable", and the whole book is no longer the main force of foundation or strengthening, but belongs to a position of "checking for leaks and filling gaps", which can be replaced by other counseling books.

Reviewing the whole book can basically contain all the basic functions of the whole book. For the system with books as the core and video as the auxiliary, it is no problem to look at Wu Zhongxiang's basic courses.