In the eyes of graduate students, mathematics is really an insurmountable gap, and the score of the initial test is largely determined by mathematics. If you have an advantage in advanced mathematics, you will get great scores with others. After all, every point in the high number is a real knife and a real gun.
Many times, each high number seems simple, and even the exercises sometimes seem very basic, but don't be careless. The big questions that follow will run through many chapters. A cross-disciplinary test of different knowledge points requires you to understand these contents deeply enough, which is still difficult for most people.
For multiple-choice questions and fill-in-the-blank questions, the score of one question is also considerable. If in a test paper, your choice of fill-in-the-blank questions is almost correct (each error is allowed 1), then you can get more than 100 points for big questions as long as there are no big mistakes.
If there are too many mistakes ahead, it will be difficult to get on 100. I hope everyone will pay attention to it and know fairly well. We often choose to fill in the blanks to test your seemingly basic but mysterious questions. Continuity and limit are our basic courses in the early stage, but these problems can really baffle a large number of people.
When reviewing, you can review directly according to the real questions. First of all, you should grasp the most important part (that is, the required test point) and start exploring from the theorem. The method is the same as above, and you must not let go of the scores you can grasp! You need to control your own progress, adjust it in time, and don't delay the later sprint. After reviewing the key parts, there will be a middle and low frequency test center to find a special topic to do (in practice, the special topic is a topic that can better represent this kind of knowledge).
Finally, I wish everyone a smooth conquest of mathematics!