It's no use! It is clever children who can play Go well, not playing chess that makes people smart. Most people in Tsinghua and Peking University can't play chess or only scratch the surface. Can they say that people are not smart? Of course, these clever children can learn math well, so it seems that all the children who play Go are good at math.

Go is a good thing, but it is the last thing that needs special study for a certain purpose. Take a professional chess player as an example, and look at the growth path of top players. It is because of the influence of the surrounding environment that they learn to fall in love. Instead of taking a career path, why not play with children? Children need to love playing chess to be happy and truly cultivate their sentiments. They go to training classes, and if they are not interested, they have to do boring questions, which is no different from the Olympics. I know two children who learn chess don't like it, and one of them is just a child I play with. It's better to learn Olympic Mathematics than to learn chess in this way. Learning olympiad well is useful for further study, while learning badly is a waste of time. What about Go? It is difficult to be directly useful, but the shortcomings are also obvious, such as being addicted to chess and cards and gradually introverted.

The common fault of chess fans is that playing chess is an elegant activity, and people who play chess look down on those who play cards, and those who play Go look down on those who play chess. As a result, their circle is getting smaller and smaller, and most of their friends are chess friends, but if they are not professionals, the higher the level, the fewer people there are, mostly because they spend too much time playing chess and have a bad life.