Marx once said that only when a subject can be expressed quantitatively by mathematics can it mean that the subject has entered the scientific stage, because mathematics is the most basic subject. If you don't understand your theory with mathematical figures, it proves that your theory is not clear enough. Mathematics is an either-or existence. It is not like dialectics in philosophy, such as dialectics in philosophy. You can give you a positive and negative argument. There are good and bad dialectics in scientific and technological development. You can say that it has advantages and promotes the development of our life. It has shortcomings that affect our lives. You can say both, but not in math. You must have a clear point of view in mathematics.
Mathematics constitutes the basis of physical chemistry, statistics, sociology, economics and so on. It is inseparable from mathematics. The mathematical knowledge that may be involved varies according to different disciplines, but in any case, it involves data, because if the discipline wants to develop, it must be supported by enough data in the early stage. You must have enough cases, or what makes you say that these things you have developed are right, whether based on past history or current developments in some fields.
Learning math well is very helpful for learning some scientific things, but on the other hand, it doesn't mean that you can't learn well, and you can't learn well in all subjects. Its influence is not as great as you think. It just means that when you are learning some specific knowledge, you may have some thinking obstacles, because mathematical thinking is abstract. If you are particularly excellent, you will have an advantage in learning any subject.