Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Mathematics review and training
Mathematics review and training
Final review is a process of relearning what you have learned this semester. The review has a wide range, a large number, tight time and rich content. In order to make the review closer to reality and achieve better review effect in less time, the following review suggestions are put forward:

(1) Make a feasible review plan.

Take the examination time as the node and make a feasible review plan according to your own learning situation. Many students made a review plan in an anticlimactic way, but they didn't implement it seriously, which led to cramming and failing to get good grades in the exam. After making a review plan, you must conscientiously implement it. When reviewing, we should find out the difficulties, doubts and the reasons why all knowledge points are easy to make mistakes, so that the review can be targeted and get twice the result with half the effort.

(2) Consolidate the concept of knowledge around teaching materials.

Textbooks are the best review materials, and outlines (curriculum standards) are the basis of review. Find out the key points and difficulties in review. For key knowledge test sites, analyze the concept paper issued by the teacher and the lecture notes made in class at ordinary times. For more difficult knowledge points, in the review stage, you may need to do more questions. Of course, I don't mean to engage in sea tactics, but it is impossible to do math without problems. We must grasp a degree.

(3) Clever use of brain map, classified arrangement of knowledge test sites.

Generally speaking, the questions in the math exam are in several aspects: first, conceptual questions, second, calculation questions, third, practical application questions, and fourth, operation questions. When reviewing textbooks, you can output the brain map of mathematical thinking according to the test questions or unit classification, and draw the mind map of unit knowledge points, conceptual formulas, question types and thinking modes, so as to change passive review into active review. Strengthen the induction and summary of knowledge test sites and deepen the understanding of knowledge points.

(4) Correctly treat the wrong problem book, so as to check and fill in the gaps.

Find out the causes of errors, such as title errors, numerical errors, formula errors, calculation errors of intermediate numbers, wrong operation sequence, unclear meaning of questions, and conceptual confusion. Put the representative mistakes into the correction book, digest them four times on the same day, the third day, one week and before the exam, that is, "137 1" for four times to review and strengthen.