number
The re-examination of the postgraduate entrance examination results is only the re-examination of the addition and subtraction of scores, which does not involve the scoring standard of test questions, and the objective questions are not re-examined. Generally, the results of the second interview remain unchanged. An important part of the postgraduate examination system is the re-examination organized by the applicant institutions after passing the postgraduate entrance examination (initial examination). Generally, it is also divided into written test and interview.
The early re-examination of graduate students was mostly a form, but since 2006, the weight of re-examination has been increased for graduate students, and some enrollment units even increased the weight of re-examination to 50%, requiring candidates to have real talent and higher adaptability.
Other aspects:
Review needs to recalculate the extra points of the exam results. Often, after mistakes are made in extra points, candidates will feel that there is a discrepancy with their estimated scores, and to be honest, this discrepancy is basically lower than their own estimates, and they will only review if they are much lower. Now it's all computer points, and it's hard to make mistakes in big items, but there may be differences between small items and title points.
Review is to see right and wrong, and if it is right, it will not be changed; If it is not correct, the goal is to correct it, so it is really lower than before, and the score may be lowered.
Therefore, the parties' applications for review are carefully analyzed, and generally this ridiculous situation will not occur.
The results review only examines the following three aspects:
1, whether to review mathematics, logic and writing or not;
2. Whether the total score is correct;
3. Is there any mistake in registration?
Whether this question has been judged wrong is not within the scope of review.
It doesn't seem to have any substantive effect, but considering that if everyone thinks they should get a higher score on this issue, then every student will apply for reexamination, which is equivalent to re-marking the test paper, which is basically impossible. Therefore, review can only go so far, and there are indeed many places that need to be improved.