Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - How to teach math test paper analysis course well
How to teach math test paper analysis course well
How to teach math test paper analysis course well

1. Form: Compared with the past, this test paper has changed in the types of test questions and narrative methods. For example, concepts and calculations appear in the form of spaces, which increases the weight of extended questions.

2. Difficulty: According to the difficulty, the test questions are divided into easy questions, medium questions and difficult questions. The score ratio of the three questions is roughly 8: 1: 1, which is slightly simpler than the last exam. Believe in yourself and fill in the blanks correctly ***23 points; I am a small judge, and I will get 6 points for right or wrong; 6 points for the right seat; Clever calculation, quick calculation * * * 36 points; 4 points for connection questions; Applied mathematics, solving problems 16 points; Contact life and practice mathematics 9 points.

3. Examining knowledge and ability: The knowledge examined in this paper covers the whole textbook, with emphasis on the second half. Calculation questions examine the calculation of some shortest tables. Fill-in-the-blank (1) is to examine the ability to use computers, (2) and (3) are to examine the writing and reading methods of numbers within 100 million; (4) Check the calculation of simple equations; The fifth is to investigate the relationship between the size of the area unit and the physical object; The third (2) is evaluation, and (6) is rewriting the evaluation number.

4. Characteristics of the test paper: the question structure is reasonable and the difficulty is moderate.

Second, the test results

I made the following statistics on the average score, passing rate and excellent rate of 90 students who took part in the fourth grade mathematics examination in our school: the average score was 66.2, the passing rate was 60%, and the excellent student rate was 30%. Maximum score 100, minimum score 23. From the statistical data, the effect is good and the expected teaching purpose is achieved. I counted the gains and losses of the big questions, and the following five questions were reflected in the examination paper of grade four:

1. Students' ability to analyze problems is not strong. The most serious problem is practice. Because students' ability to analyze problems is not strong, they can't understand the meaning of the questions well, so they lose serious points. Many students have no idea what they are looking for. They can correctly use quantitative relations, but their ability to analyze and solve problems is not enough. I think we should focus on this aspect in teaching, so that our students can get high marks and high energy.

2. I don't understand the concept deeply. Some students don't have a deep understanding of concepts when answering fill-in-the-blank questions and true-false questions, and the failure rate is 40.4%. For example, rewriting numbers, changing the law of quotient and product, and reading and writing numbers within 100 million are still problematic.

3. The computing power needs to be improved. The calculated loss rate is 3 1.7%. There are not only careless habits, but also many mistakes in division of divisor, division with zero at the end of divisor and multiplication with zero at the end of factor.

4. Poor expression ability. This is the new examination content, in order to reflect the goal of "expressing the problem-solving process and trying to explain the results" in the curriculum standard. A representative example of this test paper is the completion of the statistical chart, which exposes many problems. What information can you get from the statistical chart? What do you suggest? Many students cannot express themselves clearly.