First of all, talk about the timing. Many candidates can explain their knowledge clearly, but when they try to speak, they can't grasp the time well and don't know how long it will take, which leads to endless content and cannot guarantee integrity. We have two ways to deal with this problem. The first method is to look at the time. what do you think? There are two tips. In the group discussion session, you can say, give the students five minutes to discuss what problems, and then stop and look at the table to end the discussion. It's time to say that everyone's discussion is almost over. At this time, you will have a grasp of time. The other is to look at your watch when writing on the blackboard to estimate the time. The second is to arrange your content reasonably according to the prompt time. Generally, the time is not well grasped, either there is too much time or you are not satisfied. Then let's look at the first situation first. For example, during the trial, 10 minute trial reminds you that there is still one minute left. If you have just finished the new lecture, you will definitely not finish it. At this time, it can be completed by appropriately omitting consolidation and improving quick access to summary work. The same is true of lectures. If there is still one minute left in the teaching process, say it on the blackboard. So what if the second situation is not satisfactory? If you haven't been reminded of the time to end the trial, then at this time, you can sum up more when summing up. When giving lectures, you can talk more on the blackboard. In detail, add some educational ideas and new curriculum standards to increase your time.
Next, I will talk about how to deal with clerical errors on the blackboard. During the examination, many candidates will make mistakes in writing or knowledge points. For example, in primary school mathematics, in the process of integer division, many candidates will make mistakes, only to find that they are wrong after the calculation, and then stand there awkwardly. Some candidates will be smart enough to take this as an error correction link and say what's wrong with that classmate? Oh, you said the teacher was wrong here. This classmate is very observant. This is the teacher's intention, that is, to test students and so on. Don't do this. Some examiners didn't notice that you were wrong, but as soon as you said it, he knew and your score was deducted. Don't say anything at this time, just silently correct your mistakes and go on.
Finally, talk about some matters needing attention during the trial. Simply put, generally speaking, in order to reflect the reality, we will interact with each other. For example, we will patrol during group discussions. Remember not to go too far and patrol the corridor. The examiner has a report card in his hand, so it's definitely not appropriate for you to make a tour. Second, although we regard the examiner as a student, we should grasp a degree and ask students not to gesture near the examiner when answering questions, which is easy to make people feel disgusted.