First, assuming that backward deduction can make up for the deficiency, it means that the talent difference can be made up by the efforts of the day after tomorrow. Einstein, a famous scientist, was stupid when he was a child and failed many times, but he didn't lose heart, worked hard and finally reached the peak of science. Hua, a mathematician in China, was considered the most stupid student when he was a student. But he worked hard and studied hard, and finally achieved brilliant results. Tong Dizhou, a famous biologist in China, was laughed at for his poor grades when he was studying abroad, but he made up his mind to continue working and eventually became a world-famous scholar. Imagine, if you don't work hard for ten years, where did Einstein's theory of relativity come from? Without the spirit of tenacious struggle and self-study, where can Hua make outstanding contributions to mathematics? Without unremitting efforts, where can Tongcandizhou make remarkable achievements in bioengineering? It can be seen that diligence can make up for it, which is true. In view of the factual arguments listed above, it is assumed from the negative that the conditions that can achieve a certain result in virtual factual materials do not exist first, and what consequences will be produced, and then compared with the original conditions, thus effectively proving the central argument. Main steps: ① list examples; ② deny assumptions (imagine, if there is none); ③ draw a conclusion (the inferred case conforms to the central argument); secondly, the success of root-seeking method is inseparable from diligence. There are many hard-working people in China, and there are many examples of hard work in other countries. Edison, a great American inventor, is a model of hard work. Edison only attended primary school for three months, but he won nearly 2000 invention patents in his life. He studied hard, thought hard, forgot to eat and sleep, gritted his teeth, worked hard, and even worked in the laboratory for 20 to 30 hours. Why did Edison only attend primary school for three months, but he won more than 2000 invention patents in his life? It is undeniable that he has a keen mind and excellent scientific research ability, but at the same time he can't do without his persistent, stubborn and tireless efforts. By asking questions or causal complex sentences, we emphasize the reasons for the formation of a result in factual materials, thus highlighting the rationality of the argument. Main steps: ① Give examples ② Find the root cause (why? & lt reason > because) ③ draw a conclusion.

Thirdly, inductive reasoning method.

One needs to have lofty goals. Sima Qian, a famous historian and writer in the Western Han Dynasty, aims to show his literary talent to later generations. When he was in prison, he still insisted on his ideal-creating a historical record after he was released from prison. Goals are a kind of motivation. Only when a person has set a goal can he persistently strive for it. Sima Qian achieved great success only with lofty goals and firm determination. Material 2: Ouyang Xiu, a writer who squeezed time to write articles on horseback, pillows and toilets, or Michelangelo who got up in the middle of the night and carved bread; Whether Lu Xun squeezed out other people's coffee time to write a manuscript or Edison read three books a day, they all knew how to squeeze time into life. It can be seen that only by cherishing time can we make a difference. After listing several typical arguments, this paper makes a comparative analysis of these arguments and summarizes their similarities. Main steps: ① List multiple cases (mostly presented in whole sentences); ② Find out the similarities and differences of cases; ③ Inductive argument; Fourth, the significance of evaluation; A legal person should have lofty ideals. Yu Xia, in the thirteen years of water control, passed the house three times and didn't go in; Yue Fei, in order to save the nation, left his wife and mother, fought in the battlefield, and finally died with his son on the stormy pavilion; At that time, Wen Tianxiang, who resisted the attack of Yuan soldiers, was unyielding. After being caught by the enemy, he still faced the danger meticulously, fought resolutely with the enemy, and never surrendered to death ... These people are all people with great ideals, and they are all people who are determined to fight for great ideals. Their ideal is not for anyone, but for the country, for the nation and in line with the interests of the broad masses of people. For the sake of their great ideals, some people can give up, some people can give up their lives, and some people have really achieved the point that "wealth can't be lewd, poverty can't be moved, and powerful people can't bend." Such people will never disappear from the hearts of the people. By revealing the significance of the argument, or giving high praise, or revealing its harm, we can prove the scientificity and rationality of the argument. Main steps: ① list examples; ② Reveal the meaning (harm); (3) draw a conclusion and supplement the method of analyzing materials; Of course there are many others. It should be noted that the same argument can be discussed in many ways, which one to use depends on the situation; And it is often a combination of several methods. But no matter which method is used, it must be remembered that the purpose of analysis is to make the argument better prove the argument and make the argument more prominent and convincing. Therefore, the analysis must closely focus on the argument. For the same argument, many methods can be used. Suppose, if Li Bai did not leave Chang 'an, but chose to stay in the palace, he might just be a Li Bai who competed for fame and fortune with his ministers, just a Li Bai who whitewashed the peace of Emperor Xuanzong of the Tang Dynasty, or just a Li Bai who was trapped in endless suffering, but he would never be a Li Bai who "drank on a high platform, competed on a green cliff, drank under the moon and roared in the sky", and would never stand on the top of the prosperous Tang Dynasty. But fortunately, Li Bai knows how to refuse. Why can Bai stand on the top of the prosperous Tang Dynasty and win people's eternal respect? Because he knows how to refuse in time. Only by learning to refuse in time can we gain more. It is because Li Bai knows how to refuse and has made great achievements in poetry through his own efforts. Significance analysis Li Bai rejected the treacherous court official and the dirty and corrupt officialdom. His refusal won the glory of the poetry circle in the prosperous Tang Dynasty, and his refusal won eternal respect. If the Tang poetry is a snowy peak, Li Bai's rejection will make him the conqueror of Shuang Ling Aoxue. If Tang poetry is a sea of waves, Li Bai's rejection will make him a wave breaker; If Tang poetry is a colorful garden, Li Bai's refusal will make him an English guest who eats flowers and leaves. Inductive reasoning Tao Yuanming chose to resign and devoted himself to writing, eventually becoming the originator of pastoral poetry; Li Bai chose to leave Beijing and devoted himself to poetry creation, eventually becoming an outstanding representative of romantic poetry in the prosperous Tang Dynasty. Wang Anshi declined the purple ginseng presented by students, which is beneficial to the treatment of diseases, and achieved the demeanor of a generation of writers: everyone knows how to refuse temptation. It can be seen that only by learning to refuse in time can we gain something. If Li Bai didn't leave Chang 'an at the beginning, but chose to stay in the palace, he might just be a Li Bai who competed for fame and fortune with his ministers, a Li Bai who whitewashed the peace of the Tang Dynasty, or a Li Bai who was trapped in endless suffering. But it is precisely because he knows how to refuse, refuse treacherous officials and refuse corrupt officialdom that we can see a confident and arrogant poet standing at the top of the prosperous Tang Dynasty.

Personally, there are few cases that meet your requirements, and it is hard to find them online. Generally, only examples are given, and there is basically no analysis. The analysis of argumentative essays in senior high schools is generally on our own, and online analysis can only be used for reference. The marking teacher is always more terrible than you think. Personally, since there are every cases, analysis is not a problem. Everyone has their own unique views on everything. When you pick up other people's answers, there is no pure thought, which is a sign that one is not confident. Of course, if you are not such a person, please ignore these words.

Actually, it's not bad to achieve mastery through a comprehensive study

Hope to adopt _