It is very important to express and record the language conveniently and naturally. As for the historical accumulation at the cultural level, it is of course a kind of wealth, but sometimes it may just be a burden for use. Human beings have a rational side and a perceptual side, and it is understandable that they love their mother tongue and the script of "King James". How to make a comprehensive evaluation of a text clear in one or two sentences, one or two articles and one or two books? Different people have different views, and it is difficult to easily define who is superior and who is inferior. It is meaningless to compare the advantages of one with the advantages of another without putting the use of words in the big background (unless the starting point is limited to unilateral comparison and statement).
It is difficult to have any standard to evaluate the quality of words. Some words are written quickly, but they are easy to mix, and some words are not easy to mix but have too many strokes.
As for language, it is always in the process of change and adjustment. If some pronunciation, grammar and vocabulary are not commonly used, or make people feel bad, such as indecent, poor pronunciation and outdated, they will naturally be eliminated and replaced by new forms. No language is inherently doomed to extinction (unless the speakers of the language are in political, economic and cultural decline). Personally, I tend to think that the expressive power of language is the same.
Although there are few native words in Japanese and Korean, they have absorbed a lot of foreign words. The motivation of word-making and the tendency to make simplified or compound words cannot be viewed absolutely, which has nothing to do with the types of Chinese and Chinese characters. English uses a lot of words that can't understand every part of the meaning, which is really hard to remember, but English itself is a worldwide language, which is used by many industries, countries and groups. On the other hand, German coinage is biased. You can see the meaning of each part of a long word, and then guess, it has nothing to do with whether Chinese characters are used or not, and whether it is an isolated language. You know, after all, human society has developed into today's information age, knowledge has exploded and society has a division of labor. It is impossible for anyone to know all the subjects. Because of this, whether a word can be remembered and whether it can really understand its meaning and help your life are completely different. For example, it was pointed out that atypical pneumonia is not a kind of pneumonia, so the term is not strict. However, at that time, we must use one word to express this disease, at least people can be sure that they are all diseases, and there is no need to wait until their pathology is clear before publishing their scientific names to the whole society. Moreover, the so-called clarification may be wrong when compared with the new achievements in the future, and it is impossible to solve the problem perfectly. It is important that everyone relates a linguistic concept to the knowledge and information of the specific world. But without a background and a teacher, who would say the word SARS? And if you have experienced this period, who doesn't know what this concept is about? There are millions of chemical terms that ordinary people don't need to know at all. Even professionals have a finer division of disciplines to study and use again, and some basic logic provided by language itself can reflect a certain relationship between scientific terms to some extent. Even if language logic itself is full of contradictions, it is only an external form. True rational thinking, like the process and conclusion of scientific research that human beings are engaged in, can "lead to the same goal" with language itself. The development of solar elements is not that the elements on the sun are directly brought to our eyes, but that it is different from all known elements at that time through spectral analysis. Isn't this a good example of indirect method? Does linguistic logic have to be as strict as mathematical logic? )
With regard to the artificial planning of language or characters, it is difficult for anything designed first to remain unchanged for a long time. Even something as solid as mathematics may be overturned, not to mention the salary of employees in enterprises and what words and phrases to use in language. In Eskimo, there are dozens of simple words to represent different kinds of snow (it is said that this example is false, but it has been misinformed for many years, but it does not affect us to take this fake example as an example), while there are not many words to represent snow in Arabic, and there are many words to represent different kinds of camels. Today, with the convenience of human migration, Arabs can see what is happening to Eskimos on TV, so they will also introduce some words about snow. Living in this complicated world, how to evaluate some concepts, which will be used frequently in the future, while others will be low, so as to decide which ones should be designed as compound words, which ones should be designed as simple words, which ones should be designed as scientific names and which ones should be made into a random and interesting form? I don't know, these things can never be solved by a few people at home behind closed doors. The use of the whole vocabulary, including the changes of phonetic system and grammatical system, is the collective interaction of all people who speak this language, and it will develop naturally. Don't stick to form. Different forms can achieve the same effect.
In this regard, you can join the group 70438039 to discuss language issues.