The word' starting line' was put forward too early as the beginning of parents and schools urging and destroying their children's first life. Chyi Chin's calligraphy and painting, gravitational molecules, astronomy, geography, local customs and customs, it is not wrong to let children get in touch with these early, cultivate their temperament, develop their intelligence, and go to a higher position in the knowledge system first. But there are two key questions in this answer according to the actual situation, which are completely beyond doubt at first glance. First of all, the first question is about motivation. Parents let their children win at the starting line. Do they really think of their children wholeheartedly, without the slightest' face problem' factor? Parents' pains and intentions are not incomprehensible. However, some facts that we have to face now are: Parents A: Our family Xiaohong signed up for a piano class, and now she can play the whole piece, and now her temperament is better than before, Balabala ...? Parent B: Ah, ha, ha, ha. We are also considering it. When I got home, I began to summarize a lesson for my children. Why compare my children? That's a real pity. ? As mentioned in the title, the word' shame' is the driving force for some parents to push their children forward. Once this factor was added, the nature of the whole incident changed, from' being good to children' to' so that I can have face, but it's not harmful to children anyway'. These are two completely different concepts, which are the essential differences between egoism and altruism. This difference is the initial cause of controversy. Secondly, if parents say that I have no selfishness in letting my children study, they are thinking of their children wholeheartedly. Then the discussion of this matter is a conceptual issue, that is,' what is the starting line'. Of course, before discussing this issue, we need to consider the children's own' interest' factors, so I won't go into details here. Aside from the factor of' interest', the concept of' attaching importance to skills but neglecting people' has been deeply affecting every generation, especially in the expectations of the elders for the younger generation. However, professionally speaking, it is meaningless to accumulate a lot of pressure in a child's childhood. It's never too late to learn' skills' if you don't want to train your children into full-time professionals with specialized skills. For example, you don't want your child to become a pianist, just to cultivate sentiment and enrich life. As long as he wants to learn, it's never too late.