Such as foreign milk powder, such as foreign cosmetics. People around you are basically using it, and the channels are mostly Taobao's sea purchases!
Therefore, this ban does not prohibit the sea purchase that public opinion wants!
It's just that there are many problems in Haitao at present. Taobao is not ready, and neither are we! Just "forbidden"!
I believe that Taobao and related laws and regulations, as well as relevant administrative departments, have long begun to plan how to enjoy the "attractive" "Haitao" like Taobao! We don't need to "complain" that the ban is "unsatisfactory". We should be glad that without such a ban, there is really a big problem with sea purchase. If it is banned for a long time, it is not a good thing we hope!
Therefore, here we only discuss the new trend of sea purchase, new infinite vitality!
Regarding the prevention and control of Sichuan, the most successful and famous thing in history is "controlling water by it"!
Therefore, in today's open era, under the background of economic and trade globalization, it is too limited and short-sighted for management departments to introduce "blocking Sichuan" and "banning" to prevent a single spark.
Moreover, there are too many "administrative interventions" in our lives now! Taobao issued such a ban, which is nothing more than an "executive order"!
Whenever there is a problem, it is an administrative order. There is no specificity, flexibility or special measures at all, and "killing with one stick" is not implemented. Personally, I think the scientific approach is to really hand over the power to solve the problem of "Haitao" to "Taobao" and urge them to constantly improve and optimize, because they may have more practical experience and more ways to deal with it than our administrative department! Because they are the responsibility and development subject of sea purchase! The problem of leaving them is impossible to solve.
On the one hand, it supports the overseas development of enterprises. Personally, I think "Haitao" should belong to overseas exchanges and transactions, and it belongs to the trend of overseas development of enterprises.
So don't use administrative "intervention", let the enterprise self-improve and develop!
Look at the management and policy of cultural publications under this background.
First of all, under the background of opening to the outside world and cultural exchange, if there is a tendency of cultural conflict or political and economic influence, interference or even destruction, in a word, there are too many ways to spread and transmit, which cannot be solved simply by "blocking"!
Under the background of freedom of network communication, it is impossible to completely eliminate the words and videos of culture and cultural carriers! On the contrary, if you blindly "block", you may have a lot of "curiosity" and create opportunities for the spread of certain cultures or independent tendencies. Take China's last Japanese hotel for example, the deliberate placement of "books promoting Japanese reactionary thoughts" has aroused many people's search for the names and contents of these books.
Looking back, we can see the course of our reform and opening up, our culture and the ideas of the masses.
At the beginning of opening up, "many people criticized some people for saying that the moon in the United States is rounder than that in China", and some experts and scholars even worried that the western countries headed by the United States attempted to infiltrate culture and "spread western learning to the east"!
But the fact is, as Mr. Lu Xun said, "making foreign things serve China" is also consistent with the purpose of our reform and opening up: introducing advanced foreign experience and advanced ideas and updating our backward ideas and technologies! Although it is undeniable that when advanced ideas come in, negative and even politically inclined things also come in. Someone said, "Why don't we worry about screens when we open the windows to absorb fresh air?" So flies and mosquitoes can't get in?
Finally, I found that there is only one worry and fear, and I can only scare myself to death! Moreover, the "window screening theory" is simply not established and feasible, and the complexity of the communication process is not what we imagined! We can only isolate a part, let this part of "western culture" come in and compare it with our traditional culture and political culture. Only in this way can we honestly show our political, policy and cultural advantages, and can we really solve the problem of "infiltration of western learning into the east" and even the erosion of political tendencies ideologically!
Therefore, I personally think that the "ban" can only be used as a temporary or special period measure, not a long-term "strategic policy and layout"!
In addition, publicizing our main theme and policies and strengthening the construction of our party's ruling ability are the most important, key and long-term strategic measures in line with the main theme of the times!
In short, the open era needs open pioneering work and innovative thinking!
"Decree" is a "political harmony" plan, not a ban! Without scientific follow-up to solve the problem, it has become a "mangy dog" that poses problems for enterprises and problems!