On Danshan Road in Wan Li, Tonghua, the little phoenix is clearer than the old one.
We often look down on other people's work. We always criticize other people's work, even eggs. We also call it "sharp criticism is out of sincerity, urging you to improve, so that you don't go further and further on the wrong road." In various competitions, successful stars naturally become judges. Some cultured judges gave childish performances to the players. First, Wang Gu said a few irrelevant and inexplicable words, and then pointed out the defects and deficiencies of the players. Those unscrupulous judges, regardless of the embarrassment and face of the players, tried their best to be sarcastic and heroic, and vowed to drive the players to commit suicide by jumping off a building. I wonder, why do you have to say other people's shortcomings? Are others really useless? Can these criticisms really help others make progress? Any fool can answer this question.
Anyone who is a little more rational knows that everything is full of shortcomings and advantages as long as we look at it comprehensively and dialectically. The year before last, our school opened an open class in the whole city. Many people criticized the young teachers who taught. It seems that these teachers are simply unable to open public classes. We should know that these teachers are also recommended by our school through layers of selection, which can be said to represent the level of teachers in our school. Our school is so bad that the recommended teacher can't go to the table. After the activity, I wrote a comment and published it in the education column of Metropolis Daily. I spoke highly of every participating teacher. I believe my evaluation will bring them confidence in success and make them love their work more. Later, I listened to the open classes of several other schools, including the classes of teachers from provincial model schools, and the reaction after class was actually the same as that of our school. It seems that our teachers and experts really have high eyes, and everyone is not good at it. Aren't you the best at it?
Being superior to others is a dirty psychology, sometimes out of showing off, belittling others and raising yourself; Sometimes, out of jealousy, if you can't eat grapes, you say it's sour; Sometimes out of depression, the circle is so big. If we let you out, why not share our cake?
Some time ago, ten doctors (to be exact, eight doctors, 1 master, 1 bachelor) jointly posted a post entitled "Why should we carry out our opposition to Dan and others to the end?" It was very strong and full of criticism. This post immediately caused a sensation, and various media rushed to report it. The names of ten doctors were also known overnight. What are the doctors criticizing Dan for? I will intercept the "wonderful" fragments in the article and make comments.
The biggest disaster faced by China culture is not from the erosion of foreign culture, but from those ignorant people who are under the banner of revitalizing traditional culture. They are ignorant and don't respect traditional culture. All their actions often intentionally or unintentionally genetically modify the culture of China people-transforming human genes into mouse genes. The media's enthusiasm for such people is tantamount to using the toilet as a living room.
The doctor's knowledge is high, and he can see the genes at a glance. I really admire myopia! Doctors have a keen sense of smell and can smell the toilet at once. I really admire patients with chronic rhinitis!
Some editors and journalists lack basic cultural conscience and basic humanistic accomplishment, which is even more obvious here. If the mainstream media all sing praises to the obscenity and obscenity of China culture, then without the invasion of foreign culture, China culture is doomed to perish.
Editors and journalists are all cultural hooligans, who only appreciate crotch culture. Our doctors will never go to the media to find a job in the future, even if the annual salary is one million.
China culture has reached the most critical juncture. Compared with the Opium War and the New Culture Movement, the situation faced by China culture is more severe and hidden. Because, this time, she is facing people who are under the banner of "mining China's traditional culture rich mines". They are eloquent and flattering, but they are actually digging graves for China culture.
The revolutionary burden is heavy and the cultural suffering is deep. National culture is at a critical moment of life and death. Besides our doctors, who else can shoulder the heavy responsibility of saving national culture?
In modern democratic society, there are often many imperfect phenomena in culture. Those who make great efforts and are full of knowledge will become poor, while the shallowest authors can get great wealth by selling their works at low prices. Of course, in the democratic era, this phenomenon is normal. Although the scholar has no money, the fun of learning itself is enough to compensate for everything; If there is a standard of social life, people like Yu Dan will be rich, but they have no social status. Because mainstream voices will tell the world that they are rich but not worthy of respect.
Poverty is glorious, but wealth is shameful. We are poor, knowledgeable, have social status and noble spirit; You are rich, but you are shallow, the world looks down on you, and your spirit is empty. What a happy way poverty is! What a poor strong man! Don't say that there are few papers published in international core journals, and the manuscript fee is not US dollars. Don't say that we can't win the Nobel Prize. We despise the million-dollar prize.
Think about it. A doctor of film and television like Yu Dan, whose knowledge of ancient Chinese can't even reach the level of junior high school education, can win social honor just by speaking. Who cares about the power that guides our souls upward? Who wants to engage in arduous scientific and cultural research that really benefits the Chinese nation?
It's not fair! It's not fair! Is it true that the editors and directors of CCTV are all pig brains, and we doctors of literature who knew each other 500 years ago don't invite them, so we have to invite a layman? So is the audience. Why are you yelling? Didn't you break our doctor's heart by offering flowers of praise and applause, and more importantly, giving tickets to a woman who talks nonsense? Who will lead your souls in the future? Who else is willing to devote themselves to scientific and cultural research? Ignorance! Ignorance!
Those who vulgarize and kitsch the humanistic theory have ulterior motives or are extremely ignorant. Yu Dan is the latter. When unscrupulous media people boast that Yu Dan's books have sold 2.5 million copies, they may forget that the distribution of sex CDs in Matsuo Okubo is far more than that.
Our doctor does have a rigorous style of study and a broad research horizon. In order to prove Yu Dan's bragging, he went through all kinds of hardships, risked being suspected by his girlfriend to peek at pornographic videos, and found out the circulation of Yu Dan's books and Okubo Matsuo's sex CDs with a scientific and realistic attitude. This is the realm of learning!
"Dancing in court can be tolerated, but not tolerated!" We hereby appeal to all media people with conscience to give correct public opinion guidance. We also hope that Lecture Room will immediately remove Yu Dan and publicly apologize to the people of the whole country. Only in this way can the people of China rebuild our spiritual homeland, China culture will be brilliant again in the new century, and our life will be more harmonious. !
Only when Yu Dan admits his mistake, "China people can rebuild our spiritual homeland, China culture can be brilliant in the new century, and our lives can be more harmonious." What a good point of view! What a profound logic! The doctor is knowledgeable and responsible! Admire it, shame it! How can we let Yu Dan fool around?
The doctor got up and the vigorous "backward movement" began. A large number of monographs on justice, such as Jiedu Yudan, Confucius was in a hurry, and Zhuangzi was very angry, were filled with bookcases, silently facing two toilet books, Yu Dan said the Analects of Confucius and Yu Dan said Zhuangzi. Those "justice monographs" can't wait to jump up, slap themselves, tear up and throw the trash can. Unfortunately, there are too many ignorant readers. These "books of justice" can only watch people pay for the "toilet books" they take home, but they are covered with dust day by day. ...
What a terrible psychology! Is jealousy irrational? Or is it really like people say, "Bachelor of Gold, Master of Silver, Doctor of Garbage?" Paranoia and ignorance are undoubtedly exposed in this open letter. This is our doctor, the elite of our culture. As a teacher, I feel inexplicably sad!
However, in the uproar of doctors, 90-year-old Ren said in an interview with the column group of New Xingtan of Shandong Satellite TV.
Columns can tell more stories, and telling stories is more interesting than giving lectures. Telling a true story is also a good popularization angle to let the audience know more.
In the process of cultural propaganda, the media should be a good "tour guide", and a tour guide is to guide the audience to read the original, think for themselves, and never abandon the original. At the same time, interpretation should not be divorced from society.
Popularizing traditional culture can find a way that is easy for the masses to accept. For example, Yu Dan's lecture focuses on popularization.
Who is Ren? I believe doctors should know. Maybe "there is specialization in the industry", but they really don't know. I copied Mr. Ren's information here:
Born in 19 16, Shandong Plain. 1938 graduated from the philosophy department of Peking University, and then taught in the philosophy department of Peking University. 1964, was appointed to establish the Institute of World Religions of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences of China Academy of Sciences, and later served as the director and researcher of the Institute. He is also the president of China Atheism Society, China Tibetan Buddhism Research Society and Chinese Philosophy History Society. 1985 curator of Beijing Library (predecessor of National Library) and honorary director of Institute of Religious Studies. He is a representative of the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh National People's Congress. He is currently the honorary curator of Guo Tu. Monographs include Collected Papers on Buddhist Thoughts in Han and Tang Dynasties, Collected Papers on Buddhism in China (co-authored) and On the History of China's Philosophy, and edited History of Buddhism in China, History of Taoism in China, Religious Dictionary and Tripitaka.
Why do Mr. Ren and doctors have completely different attitudes towards? This is because people's moral realm is different, and the more knowledgeable the elderly, the more they praise and reward the younger generation; The more fake scholars with silver spears, the more they like to belittle others. Praise needs not only a kind heart, but also the support of moral knowledge. Therefore, in a sense, praise is the embodiment of self-confidence. Praise is like giving roses, perfunctory others and perfunctory yourself.
"When I was ten years old, I cut poetry, and the cold ashes moved." Han Donglang, named Han Wo, is the child of Li Shangyin's brother-in-law Han Zhan. A 10-year-old child, like Yuan Hu in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, can export poems in a hurry, but what children do is not a jingle. He already knows how to cut it. This is a poem in the true sense. It's really not easy!
"Tonghua Wan Li Danshan Road, the little phoenix is clearer than the old phoenix." On Danshan Road, the plane trees are graceful, the phoenix birds fly and sing in the forest, and the voice of the little phoenix is crisp and loud, resounding through the sky. ...
Li Shangyin compares himself to an old phoenix and Han Wo to a young, energetic, talented and dominant chick. His praise is beyond words.
Later, Han Wo became a romantic figure in the political and literary world at the end of the Tang Dynasty, leaving a bright figure in the dark sky at the end of the Tang Dynasty and writing a wonderful life. Who can say that this has nothing to do with Li Shangyin's praise?
Criticism will only kill genius, but praise can inspire people's greatest potential. We hate those self-righteous criticisms, let the praise come more violently!