The most convenient way in mathematics is to do it according to the directory structure in the textbook, which is scientific and targeted.

When correcting the wrong questions, you must mark the relevant knowledge points. The advantage of this is that to mark the knowledge points, you must re-examine the questions. This process is the process that the teacher emphasizes the connection of knowledge points in class, and it is also the process of establishing the connection between knowledge points and topics.

② Many topics are composed of several knowledge points. At this time, when students mark the knowledge points, they mainly mark the wrong knowledge points, but they also suggest that other related knowledge points should be marked.

2. Copy the content of the question

Besides the original question and the correct answer, the most important and striking thing is the source of the error. The root of the wrong question is the core of the wrong question book! Only by finding out the causes of the mistakes can we further study in the follow-up study and review.

If the cause of the error comes from the learning method, then we should focus on the later training method; If the root cause of the error is unclear concept, then the first step is to repeatedly understand the concept ... different error causes and subsequent remedial measures are different. Therefore, the source of the error must also be indicated in the wrong book.

Link 2: Error Correction

Error correction is the most important link in the collation of wrong questions. Its core is that it is not enough to "correct wrong questions" once or twice. We should also start with basic knowledge and problem-solving ideas to achieve the goal of "no loss of points for similar questions".

1, correct the error in time.

Practice has proved that the effect of correcting mistakes on the same day is much worse. The main reason is the correct answer given by the teacher. Students are generally impressed. Compared with the correct answers in the impression, it is often difficult to define whether they will be true or false. A better way is to correct the mistakes at the weekend when they are completed. The advantage of this is that although the answer to the wrong question will still be impressive, it will not be clear. Doing the wrong question again will make it easier to recall the teacher's original explanation and deepen the impression.

2. How to solve the problem of "meeting"

The foothold of the meeting should be based on the root of mistakes. If the relevant knowledge points are not clear enough, we should review the class notes or textbooks first, and then correct the mistakes. 、

Before correcting mistakes, students should read the notes at this stage and review the key points emphasized by teachers in classroom teaching and homework test evaluation.

The method to verify whether the wrong question is true or false is relatively simple, that is, after one month, go over the corrected wrong question again. This can further consolidate the experience of error correction, find the loopholes that still exist after error correction, and facilitate the next work.

The realm of meeting is divided into two levels: 1. See if you can do the problem without making mistakes. 2. See the problem that you didn't do wrong. The former is the most intuitive, and the latter needs a certain amount of stretching exercises to achieve.

3. Handling of the above two wrong problems

If the corrected wrong questions are still wrong, you need to upgrade the wrong questions, which is a must-see and must-do question before the exam. Usually, the topic of this situation can be slightly removed from the problem of inattention and reading, so we must pay attention to the relevant basic knowledge and formulas.