53 is not good, many questions are not practical. In fact, I think most of the mathematical materials are not very good, and they are not very targeted to a certain province. Specific to the students they teach, there are even more. What's more, although it is a round of review, not every knowledge point should be explained and emphasized, but the key points should be emphasized.

I have been making my own study plan since 2006. In the future, we only need to make appropriate changes according to the situation encountered in teaching last year, the new questions of the college entrance examination that year, and the learning situation. Relatively speaking, review is more targeted and directional.

I used the 2005 Century Gold List, and I feel a little better.

It is suggested to use the Century Gold List, and appropriately delete and supplement it according to the actual situation.