Friends who have been exposed to the theory of Quantum Space know that the strength, gravity and electromagnetic force given by the theory all come from the coupling stress between positive and negative space elements, and the Planck force with the stress of 10 44n is mathematically deduced, which is a great force and corresponds to a great energy density.
/p/7626737 1
Such a strong energy density is the basic idea of quantum field theory, and vacuum has huge energy. The vacuum is not empty. In the microscopic region, space has huge energy and vacuum field due to the break of gauge symmetry. When measuring a macroscopic vacuum, due to the coupling of positive and negative space elements, they cancel each other out, resulting in a smooth and uniform vacuum with strong gauge symmetry. Vacuum shows the characteristics of zero point energy, and it seems that all the energy has disappeared. According to the field theory and mass-energy relationship, the oscillation of such a powerful space element energy field can produce matter, which should be particles with great mass. Modern physics has observed that vacuum can produce particle antiparticle pairs, which is proof. Experiments should be further designed to observe the generation of large particles.
Electromagnetic force is not discussed here, because the mathematical form of electromagnetic force and gravity is similar on the surface, but its internal principle is quite different. Although [Quantum Space] shows that the source of these forces is the tension of space elements, only strength and gravity are discussed here.
The existence of the nucleus shows that there is a force that tightly gathers energy and forms a real nucleus. Obviously, this force is a vector, pointing to the geometric center inside the nucleus, otherwise the existence of the nucleus cannot be explained. Since the force points to the nuclear center, it means that the nuclear center is the source of the force. There is only one existence that we can understand, and that is Planck space. According to the cognition of modern physics, the force of aggregating quarks and gluons is very strong, and the force source is Planck space. Therefore, it is very obvious that there is a huge force in Planck space to bind energy to form nuclei. According to the quantum space theory, the gravitational source is anti-space and the strong source is positive space. The nature of force is different, but the magnitude and vector of force are the same. They are all the tension between positive and negative space elements-Planck force, and the force vector points inward to the center of the structure. So the form of action is the same, although the energy properties are different. Strong condensation can form matter state, and gravitational condensation can form antimatter state.
/p/7 1806222
Weak force is defined as one of the four basic forces in modern physics, but the theory of [quantum space] holds that weak force is the energy overflow caused by gravitational waves squeezing the particle volume, not the internal force of the particle itself, so weak force is very special. For example, gravity, strong electromagnetic force are all strong gauge symmetric forces (because they are all derived from the stress of positive and negative space elements), while the parity of weak force is not conserved, which actually shows that the nature of force sources is different. (the weak force comes from the compression of gravitational waves), and the non-conservation of parity indicates that the internal force distribution of particles is uneven, which is not discussed here. As for why the theory of weak unification of electricity won the Nobel Prize, we will not make an evaluation for the time being, and we will come to a conclusion later. The theory of electric weakness may have a further explanation. At this point, we have a general view of the four major forces. The following focuses on gravity and strength to analyze.
First, let's look at the power function curve Y = 1/x 2.
After x(0.5), the attenuation slope is very low (like gravity and electromagnetic force? ), and after y(0.8), the enhancement slope is very high (image intensity? ), but they follow the same functional relationship, that is, y = 1/x 2. If we take y as the homologous force and x as the distance, let's see if they have the same functional relationship for gravity.
Gravity F = GMM/R 2, and electromagnetic force is similar, that is, the force f is inversely proportional to the distance R 2, and the function curve is located on the x axis, with high smoothness and long action distance.
Look at the strength. Modern particle physics has no accurate intensity value, because it is difficult to measure the intensity of their interaction at a small distance, and only rough calculation can be made. The predicted strength is 10000 tons, not to mention the calculation formula of strength. But we can give clear strength range data, namely10-15m-10-20m. If we take a median 10- 17.5m and then square it,
( 10^- 17.5m)^2= 10^-35m
Are you familiar with it? Yes, it is Planck length! We found the space element with the smallest structure in space. The square of this distance R 2 has a functional relationship with the force source of the space element Y =1/x 2, and the gravitational electromagnetic force is inversely proportional to R 2. This is a strong hint that they may follow the same law and receive the same force source, but it is not clear whether the force is the same.
Let's analyze it further. The median range of strong force is 10- 17.5m, proton radius is 10- 16m, and Planck length lp = 10-35m. For the convenience of calculation, we adopt the unit system and set LP as "step". This action distance is equal to r = 10 17.5 times ~10/9 times (step size), and Planck force FP = 10 44n owned by Planck volume is the force source. According to the above function curve, the strength is
F intensity = FP/r 2 = 10 6n ~ 10 9n
Take a median value to get the strength =107.5n.
According to modern physics, the estimate of strength is 10000 tons, or 10 7 kg. The kilogram commonly used in general physics is converted into Newton, and n is the unit to measure strength. Because it has a fixed conversion relationship with kg, these two quantities are often used as equivalent relationships. The calculated results of the formula are in good agreement with the actual physical measurement results. As can be seen from the above function curve, a slight change in the variable X will cause a drastic change in Y, so modern particle physics uses exponent to calculate the size when calculating the energy interaction between particles, which is not as accurate as electromagnetic and gravitational calculation. After all, the experimental accuracy can not be achieved, and the uncertainty principle gives a strong limit.
As you can see, according to the same function curve, we get the result that the gravitational electromagnetic force is equal in strength. When analyzing force, we analyze that the acting distance of strong force and gravitational electromagnetic force is the same, both of which are 1/r 2. According to this relationship, we also calculate the values of hadron force and Planck force, and the results are in good agreement with the experimental results obtained by modern particle physics. All three forces lie on the curve of the function y = 1/x 2.
Modern particle physics does a fine job of gravitational electromagnetic force, but it can't accurately measure the range and magnitude of force, so there will be tolerance in experiment and theory, which is determined by the data source. At present, the estimation of strength by modern physics may not be very accurate. According to the above function curve, all the force sources are Planck force, that is, the tension between positive and negative space elements, so it can be reasonably inferred that the coupling of force and gravity is equal to the tension of space elements (Planck force).
F strong ×F quotation = 1
The relationship between force and gravity is mutual. If the strength is set to 1, the strength of gravity should be 10-44 instead of 10-39, with a tolerance of 6%. If gravity is 10-44, which is in good unity with Planck's unit, it will play a good enlightening role in quantum mechanics. Our understanding of power is not very accurate.
Pushing open the window, it cleared up and a curve Y = 1/x 2 appeared in the sky, which was posted to commemorate the completion of this article.
Read the full text
/kloc-released 0/years ago, and the copyright belongs to the author.