Especially against the inference drawn from mathematical research. Mathematics can be learned in form and quantity; Mathematical reasoning is used to prove that form and quantity are logical. The biggest mistake is to regard the so-called pure mathematical truth as abstract truth and general truth. This is all wet, so it is surprising to see that the world generally agrees with this view. Mathematical principles are by no means universal.

For example, it is more suitable for form and quantity, but it is often not suitable for psychology at all. In psychology, the principle that all parts add up to a whole is usually wrong. In chemistry, this principle does not apply either. It is not appropriate to consider motivation; Because the two motives have their own meanings, the sum of the two motives does not necessarily equal the sum of the two meanings.

There are many mathematical reasons, only within the scope of comparison. However, mathematicians, out of habit, demonstrate on the basis of such limited truths as if they are universally applicable-the world does think so.

The material world and the immaterial world are very similar in many places. Therefore, the definition of rhetoric is somewhat true, with metaphors and similes, which can not only be used to modify narrative texts, but also strengthen the power of argument. For example, the principle of inertia seems to be the same thing in physics and metaphysics. In physics, it is more difficult to push a big object than a small one.

He also said that the subsequent amount of exercise is directly proportional to the driving force; Metaphysics says that smart people who are better than others are more powerful, more persistent and more serious than smart people who are not as good as themselves, but in the first few steps, they are not very frank, but coy and hesitant. These two truths can no longer be true.