The so-called dialectics itself is correct, especially in the early days of reform and opening up, many dialectical thinking that divides into two and analyzes specific problems is of decisive significance for emancipating the mind and opening up the nation. At this time, the value of dialectics is worthy of recognition.

LZ is right about one thing. Dialectics is now overused by many people, especially in the era of lack of universal belief. If people split in two, they will start to have a crisis of faith. We are not sure or deny anything very simple. For example, the concrete analysis of specific problems has begun to fall into the whirlpool of so-called reality and so-called darkness, so the transformation of dialectics is worth thinking about.

However, personally, dialectics is still very meaningful. I think the dialectics in LZ should be the dialectics in philosophy. The real dialectics is the dialectical thinking that transcends individuals like Marx, especially western philosophy. This dialectical thinking is the only way for us to explain or solve problems perfectly. Ma Zhe's dialectics is based on criticizing metaphysics, but at the same time he denies the logic and judgment of metaphysics, although the rigor of logic and thinking is the core of metaphysics. So my suggestion is that LZ should study dialectics well, which is the basis for us to discuss all kinds of thinking now. Even if you want to criticize, you need to master it systematically. If you can master it, I think you will gain a lot, not only in your thinking, but also in your studies and majors.

I hope it is helpful to you. Welcome to continue our discussion. This is a big problem in philosophical speculation.