Admitting students' differences not only means admitting that there were differences before education; And after the teacher's education, there will be differences. As the topic owner said, "some people in the same class are close to full marks, and some people failed in the exam." This is a normal phenomenon. Neither the teacher nor the students can be blamed.
Because each student has different intelligence and different foundation; Attention is different, learning motivation is different, all the differences are manifested in the exam, that is, some are close to full marks, and some fail. "
Everyone must admit that no matter how good a teacher is, he can only teach one champion, and the rest can only take the second place in the exam, exploring flowers, and will never teach 10 champions at the same time.
The important issue is that we should adhere to the principles of "teaching without distinction" and "teaching students in accordance with their aptitude" and persistently carry out targeted education for different types of students.
Note "Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude" and "teaching without distinction" are both educational and teaching principles put forward by Confucius. The article also explains "teaching students in accordance with their aptitude". Here only explains "there is no class in education". There are two meanings of "teaching without class". First, it means that all kinds of people can be educated, regardless of their dignity and virtue; The second refers to people. People are originally "superior", such as some smart, some stupid, some filial and some unfilial, but these differences are eliminated as far as possible through education. Source: The Analects of Confucius Wei Linggong.
As an old teacher, I want to analyze this problem. In the same class, there is a huge gap between top students and students with poor grades. Who is in charge?
There is an old saying in China: Look at the boss at the age of three and look at the old at the age of seven. It shows that many people's abilities are born, and some are acquired.
Genetic intelligence is the first but not the key factor. How good a child's study habits are, how strong, persistent, earnest and hard-working are the key factors. The cultivation of teachers in school education only teaches students what they don't understand and corrects the deviation of students' thoughts and behaviors. The society needs teachers who turn the stone into gold, and it is the expectation of parents and the dream of teachers to train all students into college students of Tsinghua Peking University. All roads lead to Rome. Everyone has his own way of life. Those who are admitted to the university may be excellent in the future, while those who are not admitted to the university cannot be said to have a bleak future. Parents are calm, teachers do their best, and students' psychological burden is not so great, so they can study happily and grow up healthily.
The main responsibility is still the students. As the saying goes, the master leads the door and practices in himself. In ancient times, there were Confucius, 3,000 disciples and 72 sages. None of these 3,000 students became sages, including family learning environment, personal hobbies and personal talents. Dragon gave birth to nine children, not Jackie Chan, each with its own advantages. Aren't people's ten fingers uneven in length? In learning, teachers are only external factors, and students themselves are internal factors, which play a decisive role. I once taught a student who was extremely naughty and had average academic performance. Now you are a county-level leader, and you should not only look at your academic performance for a period of time, but also look at the end. A man is now a junior high school English teacher. He mentioned that he was a deskmate in high school and is now a medical expert and professor in this city. The English teacher seems a little unconvinced. In fact, everyone usually deliberately doesn't get full marks in exams, so as not to make others jealous. Some of the easiest blanks are deliberately omitted. If the overall score of the whole class is calculated, the teacher can only bear the defect of poor organization of teaching, but it is not the main one.
The responsibility 100% lies with the students.
Even parents with little culture in rural areas know that children follow their parents. With the popularization of education, genetics can really play a decisive role.
I'm not boasting of my strong teaching ability and sense of responsibility, but I've been teaching for decades, and I really can't do anything for many poor students. Take teaching mathematics as an example. In the first and second grades of primary school, if you work hard, the excellent rate (above 90% is excellent) can reach 100%. However, in the third grade, students began to divide, and it was not easy to achieve the pass rate of 100%. Two-thirds of the students will know the new lesson for 20 minutes in one class. It's too difficult for you to use the remaining twenty minutes to make up the lecture for another third of the students. If you make up lessons for these students in the self-study class, some students will not get in the oil and salt.
I have analyzed these students, and it is true that they have bad thinking. You learn addition, he uses addition, and you learn multiplication, he uses multiplication. It's all groping. When he learned to add, subtract, multiply and divide, his mind couldn't keep up with the trip, so he couldn't touch it again. In the long run, teachers will lose confidence in them. It is normal for them to fail in their grades.
Therefore, it is normal for students in a class to get full marks and fail. I often wonder whether the country should do an experiment. 30 students were randomly selected from rural areas, and the most capable teachers were selected to teach from grade one to graduation from high school. Let's see if the excellent rate of these 30 students has always been 100%, and whether they can all be admitted to the university. Prove the great power of education.
Is it because your children and students who failed the exam asked such ridiculous questions and put the blame on the teacher?
There are always 50 or 60 students in a class, and there are always so many students who scored below 60 in the exam. Do you think the teacher can't teach? Not exactly. Students who fail the exam are called underachievers. The formation of underachievers is caused by many factors. There are intellectual factors, family reasons, society and so on. But I think the most important thing is the problem of students and parents. Such students must be half-hearted in class, as described in Learning Chess. Parents either spoil their children too much and never look after their reading and homework at home. In a word, they never care about their children's study, watching TV and playing mobile games ... never stop. Such students don't concentrate on their studies, but all they think about is games.
Do you think the teacher can't teach? Then why do some students get close to full marks in exams? This is enough to show that the teacher has been very dedicated. Look for problems from yourself, and don't put this childish responsibility on the teacher.
When the teacher carefully explains the courseware that he has spent a lot of energy in class, most students are listening carefully and taking notes, but some people are outside the classroom, seemingly listening to the class but actually thinking about their own worries. Some students can't listen to what the teacher says because of the contradiction between their parents at home, some are thinking about how to write love letters, some are still immersed in the touching plot of novels or film and television dramas, and some even secretly read novels and play mobile phones below. There is a star's song in the Bluetooth headset, and some even chat with netizens or make the classroom scene into a Tik Tok or joke ... The modern version of Qiu Yi's story is being staged in the classroom, and the teacher can only teach but not educate people because he is afraid to take care of the students (because of the profound lessons in this respect, even losing his job), and because of unfair worries such as evaluating and hiring professional titles, he is still teaching with a broad mind, but it is difficult to teach the worst class effectively. If you teach a key school or a key class in an ordinary school, the students are of good quality and hardworking, and no students will attend classes, because these students are high-quality students, but they can't all be said to have straight A's. Some students are still the same teacher in class, and their grades are still unsatisfactory because of their own reasons. If a teacher teaches a so-called teaching class that divides students into several grades according to their test scores, and at the same time teaches a class with the worst grades (poor discipline, poor foundation, so poor that they can't understand the class, don't think about learning, just muddling along, and even parents find it difficult to manage), it would be nice for the teacher to have a good class smoothly. Do you still expect to make achievements? You have to go to every class with great love and patience and meditate in your heart. I teach carefully, and students who listen carefully can learn well. I can't control the students who are not serious, but my teaching task has been completed. I have finished a series of knowledge points such as exam materials and papers. I have a clear conscience and you don't listen to educational criticism. Who are you complaining about for your own reasons? Are all these poor grades the same? Therefore, no matter the key class, the ordinary class or the backward class, it is impossible for the same teacher to teach and achieve the same effect. Because students are not machines, they are people with different qualities, plus the influence of their own life and family environment, so their learning attitude and knowledge base affect the learning and performance of the subject. How can they blame the teacher? Education is a whole systematic project, involving all aspects of family, students, schools and society, and cannot be analyzed by rigid dogmatic methods!
As a teacher, I will answer this question.
Let me share a real case that happened in our school.
One year, our school asked Mr. Yang to teach math in Class One, Grade Five. Teacher Yang is over 50 years old and in poor health. Originally, he had not taken a subject for two years, but that year the school was short of math teachers, so he sent this old teacher who was in poor health.
Teacher Yang is also very serious in class, but for physical reasons, she has to take three days off to go to the hospital. At one time, I even went to the hospital for a month. Because there was something wrong with his lungs, the doctor asked him to do a biopsy, fearing that it was a malignant tumor. Finally, it was a false alarm. After the inflammation disappeared, Teacher Yang returned to school.
When he was in hospital, one of his teachers in the same grade helped watch the last class, and the other helped watch the last class. The students learned very poorly. When he came back to class, he found that his classmates studied badly in front of them and their study habits were still very poor. Many students don't listen carefully in class, don't finish their homework after class, and even don't finish some classroom homework.
After the last biopsy, Mr. Yang knows his way around and thinks that health is the most important thing. If students don't finish their homework, Teacher Yang will give them time to make up. If students really cheat and don't make up for it, Mr. Yang won't be angry and won't force students to make up for it.
In this way, after the final exam, only one class did very well in math, 9 1. One third of the students are in their sixties and seventies, and half of them fail. The average score is only about 60.
Seeing this situation, the school immediately arranged another young teacher with strong teaching ability, Zhang, in a double class next semester to save this bad situation.
After taking this class, Mr. Zhang is very strict in management. Most students dare not listen carefully in class and dare not finish their homework after class. The students have made great progress. In the mid-term exam, a quarter of the students got 90, and even one student in the class got full marks. The average score reached 8 1 minute.
In this way, Mr. Zhang made the class's performance rise slowly, but it has not yet reached the fourth grade of this class. Teacher Zhang continued to carry out strict management. Two-thirds of the final exam scored 90 points, with five perfect marks, and the average score jumped to 93 points.
It's supposed to be a good result, but that's it. There is another student in the class who only got more than 40 points. Teacher Zhang asked the former teacher of this class, saying that this student has poor memory, poor understanding and extremely slow response. She has failed in the past.
In fact, Mr. Zhang usually spends a lot of time on this student who only scored more than 40 points. As long as it's not Chinese or math, please go to the office for individual counseling. Starting from the calculation of the lower grade, the multiplication formula of the second grade began to cram for the Buddha's feet.
In the process of tutoring, Mr. Zhang also found that the student's acceptance ability is extremely poor. Simple calculations have to be done wrong, and multiplication formulas have to be memorized wrong, not to mention grade application problems in grade five. Finally, Teacher Zhang, who is recognized by our school as Desperate San Niang, also said that there was no way to teach, so we had to wait until graduation.
Conclusion: In the same class, if a student gets full marks and someone fails, most of the responsibility lies with the students or parents rather than the teacher.
If the responsibility really lies with the teacher, many students will fail, and only one or two students will get 90 points, just like Teacher Yang.
Moreover, the subject said that there are close to full marks in the exam, and it is estimated that there should be quite a few 90 points. There are also failures. It is estimated that, just like the students who Mr. Zhang tries his best to coach, because of intellectual reasons or other reasons, they can't understand and learn.
This is a normal distribution. It is normal to fail a course with full marks, and some courses may be 0. Whose responsibility is this? Neither the teacher nor the students are responsible.
No matter how high the teacher is, it is impossible to teach the whole class full marks, unless the paper is very simple and is caused by the worst students. Are students responsible? No, as long as you try your best, how many points you can get in the exam is actually a reflection of students' learning ability.
That's what mental work is like. People who have never been to school think learning is easy. What he feels is only the pain and fatigue brought by the monotonous and repetitive work in the enterprise. I don't know that mental work is also bitter and tiring. As a student, I don't want to get full marks in all the doors, and I can get the first place in my class and grade. This is a very glorious thing, but 1 can only have one, and the rest are people other than the first place.
There are differences in students' personality, IQ and intelligence, and the degree of effort is also different. In addition, each child's family environment and parents' attention are different, which leads to different learning effects in the learning process.
Everything is natural. Don't ask who is in charge. No one is responsible, but how much everyone has paid and how much they will get back. Only some people get twice the result with half the effort, while others get twice the result with half the effort.
If you want to greatly improve your academic performance and surpass others, you have to pay twice or even n times the activity expenses of others. Otherwise, it is impossible for you to surpass others in your efforts, not to mention enjoying success, being whimsical, and dreaming that a big pie will fall from the sky without paying any labor.
The responsibility must lie with the teacher.
There are differences in students' IQ, I absolutely agree. However, this is not a reason for teachers to excuse themselves. Teachers must be responsible for the problems in students' grades. Please think about it. Some teachers you have met will use different methods in class according to the individual differences of students. If the class is for all students, but the teacher takes care of the top students or most of them, if some students have low IQ, and some teachers use other methods to tutor the top students, they will pay more patience than the top students. Students are different, so teachers are required to adopt different methods. Please think about it. Can the teacher do it?
In fact, this question misses a person, the most responsible person. Those are parents.
Children's talents are high and low, but some children without talents can often become excellent through acquired efforts. Similarly, some children are smart and talented, but they just don't know that their efforts are not good.
What kind of children are cultivated has little to do with teachers, but depends entirely on parents. Teachers just teach students knowledge, and everyone treats them equally. As for how much you can learn, it depends on whether the students are diligent and talented.
The most unreasonable way to shirk responsibility is to say that children whose parents can't teach them well are not taught by teachers. I can't teach a child well, but I blame the teacher in charge of so many children for not teaching well.
You know, parents can't teach their children well, and neither can teachers. Often from the attitude of parents shirking their responsibilities, we can indirectly understand why children's grades are so poor.
Teachers only teach children knowledge, and parents should teach children how to be a man and how to be a serious student. These are the responsibilities of parents. Only by cooperating with each other can we teach a good student, instead of passing the buck.
On the one hand, the child is taken care of very well. As soon as the teacher criticized, he went to the teacher to reason. On the other hand, he complained that the teacher didn't teach the children well. Such parents can't teach excellent children.