Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - How to write quality analysis
How to write quality analysis
How to write an examination quality analysis report

"Management by objectives examination" refers to a large-scale standardized examination after a certain period of study. The purpose of the examination is to check the situation of teachers' teaching and students' learning. Check the realization of teaching and learning objectives. On this basis, formulate or revise the learning target management plan for the next stage. Therefore, it is very important to write an examination quality analysis report.

In a paragraph, the quality analysis report of MBO examination should include two aspects: examination paper analysis and answer state analysis.

First, about the analysis of test papers.

Mainly: 1, the strategic thinking of composing papers. 2. The content of the test paper. 3. The weight of test scores. 4. The difficulty, validity and reliability of the test questions.

1, the strategic thinking of composing papers. This paper mainly states what knowledge and ability the test paper is designed to guide students to pay attention to, and tell them which are the key teaching sections and which problems are easy to make mistakes. Verification goal of teaching success or failure index.

2. The content of the test paper mainly describes what the teaching content of this period is and how the test paper covers these contents; How to balance with the previous period, and what are the problems with the merged content?

3. The score weight of the test questions. It mainly states the proportion distribution of the questions in the whole volume, and how the knowledge, ability and key sections are arranged.

4. The difficulty, reliability and validity of the test questions. What is the difficulty ratio, such as 3: 6: 1 or 3: 5: 2? Is the test result consistent with the hypothesis? (Generally speaking, the difficulty coefficient of easy questions is 0.95-0.75, the difficulty coefficient of intermediate questions is 0.74-0.6, and the difficulty coefficient of difficult questions is 0.59-0.20, which is different from the college entrance examination and senior high school entrance examination. Reliability should not only explain the authenticity of the results, but also explain the relevance of the contents involved in the questions to teaching. Validity, mainly refers to the effectiveness of the test, is whether the discrimination of the test questions is high, that is, the top students get high marks and the poor students get low marks. The worst problem is that there is no discrimination and no negative correlation. The second is whether the test questions are valid. If 100% of the candidates are right or wrong, the test questions should be regarded as invalid, especially those that are completely wrong.

Second, about the answer.

The main contents of the answer are as follows: 1, score; 2. lose points; 3. Analysis of learning situation; 4. Success or failure analysis of mathematics.

1, scores, mainly including: ① grades and classes with average grades; ② The highest score, the lowest score; (3) The distribution map (table) of scores of candidates at all levels, and the scoring rate of each test question.

2. Losing points: mainly: ① The main reasons for losing points; (2) On which issues did you lose points? (3) statistics * * * the same rate of missing points.

3. Analysis of learning situation. Mainly include: ① correlation between pre-test prediction and test results; (2) What problems have not been thought of in advance; (3) What is consistent with the forecast.

4. The analysis of teaching success or failure mainly includes: ① the correlation between the tested questions and teaching. What measures have been taken; Two questions that failed in the exam. What negligence; (3) What problems are ignored or ignored in teaching?

Three. Future measures

This part mainly writes down what is the teaching task in the next stage, what is the goal in the next stage, what to remedy, and what measures are there, especially the measures of layered teaching. What is the successful experience of the last issue and how to further develop it?

There is no fixed format for teaching quality analysis report. The above are just some personal opinions, for teachers' reference only.