There is no need to read too many so-called grand prize papers. Every year, the beauty contest questions are different, and it is not good to just look at them. Experts who use too bad methods will be tired of aesthetics. There are thousands of combinations of methods, mainly depending on their own mathematics and computer level. If you want to read it, you should pay more attention to the structure and outline of the article. A good summary is half the battle, and the third prize was brushed off because of this failure.

Americans don't pay much attention to the right or wrong results, and the optimization and innovation of existing algorithms account for more than half of the scoring standards. If you want to win the first prize and the grand prize, this must be highlighted, even if the final answer is wrong. So pick out two or three good articles and analyze the structure and innovation of the articles.