You are a cross-school postgraduate, so I will deal with it temporarily as you don't have a familiar tutor. In recent years, the state's emphasis on academics will make the entrance examination fair. The second interview will not be brushed because you lack relevant experience in undergraduate course. The second interview is a comprehensive consideration, which not only tests your professional knowledge, but also tests your psychological quality and way of thinking. Even a scholar will have his own blind spot in knowledge. How do you behave when you encounter problems that you can't do in an interview? You can just say no or defend yourself. Secondly, the initial test is generally not difficult for well-prepared cross-candidates. Do you know how many books you have taken in the professional re-examination of the cross-examination school? Can you quickly find your learning status after the initial examination and put it into a new round of review? Take myself as an example. I am also in charge of the cross-examination project. At the beginning of the professional course, I have tried one subject and re-examined four subjects. I previewed three of the four subjects at the beginning of the exam. Even in this state, I didn't do well in the written test. Open questions in the interview can only tell the relevant knowledge points, but can't be analyzed in depth. Finally, I was admitted with the first row of preliminary test results. What I want to say is that if the first test is to test your memory ability, then the second test is more to test your thinking. Many people are taking the road of cross-examination, and indeed many people have succeeded. Many people may tell you that it is not difficult to cross the exam. I hope you can pay more attention to the hard work behind those beautiful figures when preparing for the exam, learn from experience and avoid detours. I hope it will help you, and I wish you success!