Mathematics: Deng Li Anqi
(Guiyang No.1 Middle School Mathematics Special Teacher)
It is very important to distinguish between reliable score and soft score accurately in objective problem evaluation. Teacher Deng believes that the definite answer can be called reliable score, and the vague one belongs to soft score.
In the subjective part, Mr. Deng suggested that candidates evaluate their scores from the following three aspects:
First, when answering a question, if the reasoning process and calculation results completely meet the grading standards, the question can get full marks, which is a reliable score.
Second, if you only do a certain part and meet the grading criteria, then that part can be graded.
Third, only a few steps have been taken, and the reasoning process is similar to the scoring standard. According to the similarity of the answers, the corresponding scores can be estimated.
At the same time, when calculating the total score, Teacher Deng proposed the following reference methods for students' reference:
First, reliable score+soft score = the highest score;
Second, reliable score+1/2 soft score = middle score;
Third, the reliability score = the lowest score.
Teacher Deng suggested that students refer to the middle score when filling in the first volunteer, and it is safer to use the lowest score when filling in the parallel volunteer.
Language: Wu Xiaolin
(Guiyang No.1 Middle School Chinese Super Teacher)
For Chinese, Mr. Wu thinks the most important thing is to evaluate the composition accurately. Teacher Wu made suggestions for candidates mainly from the following aspects:
First, if the number of words reaches the standard, the language expression is fluent, the quoted materials are accurate and the composition structure is complete, it can be estimated at about 46 points.
Second, in addition to the above characteristics, the composition with rich materials, expressive language and literary talent is estimated to be around 50 points. This kind of candidates belong to the candidates who win by language, and the other kind of candidates who win by analysis can also be estimated at about 50 points. The success of the analysis is mainly reflected in: seeing the problem deeply and thoroughly, and seeing the essence through the phenomenon.
Third, quick thinking, fluent language expression, literary talent, comprehensive and profound perspective, which can be estimated at about 55 points.
English: Wu Youping
(Senior English teacher in the middle school attached to your Normal University)
The score of English test paper is mainly in composition. If the examinee can remember the content of his composition, he may recall the topic, write down the composition by heart, and then grade it for his English teacher's guidance, which will be more favorable for the examinee to evaluate the score. If the examinee can't remember the content frame and main structure of his composition, he can estimate an average score according to his English composition score in the usual model test.
History: Zeng Qiang
(Senior History Teacher of Guiyang No.1 Middle School)
Ceng Laoshi suggested that when evaluating history, students should carefully check the standard answers and follow the principle of "stepping on the spot", and the scores should not be vague.
At the same time, Ceng Laoshi also put forward the following suggestions for the subjective part of this year's test questions, which is difficult for candidates to evaluate accurately.
For example, in question 1 of question 38, if the answer contains "oppression" and similar expressions, you can get a score, and if the answer is "class", you can hardly get a score. Question 2, there are two scoring points. If you answer "connection" or "interconnection" and other similar expressions, you can consider estimating 2 points. Answer "prerequisite", "relationship" and other related expressions, you can consider estimating 3 points. The third question, the answer to "independence and liberation" can be considered as 2 points, and the answer to "the emergence of anti-nationalist thoughts" can be considered as 3 points. The fourth question, the content of Sun Yat-sen's thought of uniting with Russia can be considered as four points, and the reason can be considered as four points. Question 5: The understanding of globalization can be considered as 5 points, and the understanding of nationalism under the background of globalization can be considered as 5 points if the viewpoint is correct and the expression is relatively complete.
The background of question 40 1 includes two historical facts. If you correctly answer "opening up new routes", you can consider estimating 2 points and "colonial activities" can consider estimating 3 points. Question 2: If you correctly answer "changing grain structure" and related expressions in the material, you can consider estimating 2 points. "Relieve food pressure" can be considered as 3 points. In the third question, the scores of "consequences" are 2 points each, and "reasons" must be answered at least 3 points to estimate 6 points.
Politics: He Shimin
(Grade 1 teacher of Guiyang No.9 Middle School)
Due to the different language expressions of candidates, the answers may not be consistent with the standard answers. As long as candidates use professional backbone knowledge and professional terminology to answer questions, the answers meet the meaning of the questions and will be scored appropriately.
For example, the total score of 39 questions is ***32, which requires candidates to answer from the perspectives of economy, politics and philosophy. From the perspective of economics, the key points of answering questions are "the development of rural economy", "rural cooperative medical system" and "positive role". Candidates need to answer the following questions: to solve farmers' health, improve labor productivity, improve farmers' welfare, narrow the gap between the rich and the poor, and help guide farmers to establish mutual help awareness and risk awareness.
The key words in the second question of question 39 are "party", "government" and "peasant masses". The key words of the third question are "contradiction analysis method", "main contradiction in the primary stage of socialism" and "significance" Some candidates only pay attention to "the main and secondary aspects of contradiction" when answering questions, but ignore "what is the main content of the primary stage of socialism?" So you will lose points.
Geography: zhina.
(Senior Geography Teacher of Guiyang No.1 Middle School)
Teacher Yin believes that the assessment of geosciences focuses on the accurate assessment of subjective questions. In this year's test questions, some subjective questions that candidates are not easy to evaluate accurately. Teacher Yin made the following suggestions for candidates' reference.
For example, in question 1 of question 36, each of the five activity areas can get 1 point, and if you give a correct reason, you can get 2 points. In addition to the standard answer to this question, if the examinee answers "downstream of the river" or "downwind zone of prevailing wind" and "upwind zone of minimum wind frequency", it can be considered to be estimated by 2 points. The second question, emphasizing the good water quality in the upper reaches of the river, can be estimated in two points. The fifth question, emphasizing the isolation belt or protective belt, can be estimated at 2 points.
Question 40, Question 4, Empty 5: Answer "It's hot and rainy in summer" correctly, and get 3 points. If you only correctly answer "rainy in summer", it is recommended to score 2 points. The answer to the sixth question is Songnen Plain. If it is "Songliao Plain", you can estimate 2 points. The standard answer to the fifth question is 82.6%. If the answer is 82. 1%-83%, it is recommended to score 2 points. If the question is blank 3, the standard answer is 0.28%. If the answer is 0.25%-0.3%, it is recommended to score 2 points.
Chemistry: Yu Zhongliang
(Senior Chemistry Teacher of Guiyang No.1 Middle School)
"Accurate evaluation of non-multiple choice questions is the key to chemical evaluation", so Mr. Yu suggested that students should evaluate according to standard answers and comprehensive evaluation criteria.
For example, 26 questions, 6 small questions and 9 questions, in which the first small question is given 1 point for each of the three spaces, and the next five small questions and 6 questions are given 2 points for each.
There are 2 small questions and 5 blanks in the 27 questions, and each blank can be estimated to be 3 points.
Question 28, question 4, question * * * has 4 spaces, of which 1 question 3 points, and questions 2, 3 and 4 are more difficult, so each question has 4 points, of which questions 2 and 3 each have 2 answers, and each point is 2 points.
Biology: Zhou
(Senior Biology Teacher of Guiyang No.1 Middle School)
Subjective questions in biology volume (2) usually ask questions that analyze the causes of different phenomena, so candidates can score as long as the analysis is correct and the text description is clear, even if the text description of the answer is different.
For example, the 3 1 question is written in a small amount, and the answer to the question is gene expression. It is important to note that the order of the empty answer in 1 and the second empty answer in 1 is interchangeable. The answer of "27:9:9:3:3: 1" can be divided into scores, that is, you can get some scores by writing part, and the rest of the answers are not much different from the reference answers.
There is no need to dig too much into the subjective part of the biology question, and you can score if you express the main meaning.
Physics: Jin Zhongxin
(Head of Teaching and Research Group of Physics Department of your Normal University)
Candidates must judge your "copy paper" as a teacher without any interference, so that you can give your test paper a score that is basically close to the college entrance examination score fairly.
According to the practice of previous years, when scoring calculation questions, score them step by step. The main steps of answering questions have been listed in the grading standard. Generally, every step has a key formula calculation result. These formulas and calculation results are the key to scoring. When grading, be sure that you have these key formulas and calculation results.
1, if your problem-solving method and grading standard are different, then the final result is very important. If the method and process are correct and the result is correct, you can get full marks; But if the result is wrong, then some points will be deducted. Generally speaking, if the final answer to the question appears in the form of numbers plus units, and the result expressed in letters appears or has no complete answer, about 1/4 of the total score of the question will be deducted.
2. If the problem-solving method is the same as the grading standard, and the process is the same, but there is an error at the beginning, and this error does not affect other steps, then according to the practice of previous years, the cumulative score will not be deducted, that is, only the calculation error score will be deducted.
3. If the candidate's answering process is not exactly the same as the reference answer, but as long as the method is correct, you can give points according to the principle of "equal value and equal score". If a comprehensive expression written by a candidate has exactly the same meaning as the three expressions in the reference answer, you can score the three expressions.
4, if there is no narrative, only some mathematical expressions, even if the intermediate equation and the final result are consistent with the reference answer, at least one-fifth of the score of this question should be deducted. (