English 150 started, and the result was only 90 points. Moreover, math is my favorite since I was a child, so I got the college entrance examination 150 142. This is still a job. I didn't score in English. I went to a key university a long time ago and finally went to an ordinary undergraduate course. Hey! Partial subjects are harmful to people.

I think, like English, there is no obvious big progress after learning math in the college entrance examination. You see, five years in primary school is an introduction, three years in middle school is a foundation of high school knowledge, and three years in high school is an in-depth study of mathematics. Then how can you get it all done in a few days? Unless you are a genius like Chen Jingrun,

So, first of all, your focus now is on the big problem behind. Don't say that none of the previous ones can, let alone the big questions.

Hear me out. I didn't give up the previous meaning, because the big question was only 60-70 points, and the score was still ahead.

I mean, review according to the type of big questions, not just which one, but which one.

Such as function, sequence, ellipse and circle, parabola and hyperbola.

First, you should review all the theorems, definitions, inferences and theories in the book.

You only got 70 points in the exam. I can say for sure that it is because these theories are unfamiliar.

Although there are many math topics, all the topics are based on those theoretical knowledge, so as long as you are familiar with all the theories and can use them, you can at least get about 130. Don't doubt it. That's what I did in those years. No matter which chapter contains clear theoretical knowledge points and their relationships, there is no need to calculate when doing some simple small questions in front. After reading the question, I will have the answer. Generally speaking, I hand in my paper earlier than others.

Second, of course, exercises are essential.

Knowing that the theory has no actual combat is still an armchair strategist.

Because of the time, this time will be targeted. As I said before, don't go with the title.

It's about chapters. You must have many sets of simulation questions. For example, when you review the series, you will do all the questions related to the series in those sets. Don't let go of a big problem and a small problem. If you are right, you will pass. If you are wrong, read carefully according to the answer and sum up your experience. Why do you think the answer is like that, but you are wrong, or you can't figure it out at all? .

So are other chapters.

But one thing must be done: that is, we must ensure that we can do the problems we have done again. Otherwise, it is tantamount to reviewing in vain, and it will not and will not. In fact, it is not difficult to do this at all. As long as you look at the answers that you have done wrong or won't, you will always remember that you are not stupid.

In this way, review a set of papers in the first round. It is estimated that it will take about a week if it is fast, and 2 weeks if it is slow.

150 should be around 100. If I can keep reviewing until the end of the third round, then I can guarantee that it will be around 120- 130.

Of course, again, you must make sure that you can do the problem again. Otherwise, I dare not say. . .

Typing for a long time just wants to help you clear your mind. I usually only solve problems and don't answer these theoretical things. Just because you still ask this question shows that you are still a good student. I hope it helps you!