The full mark of 396 economic college entrance examination 150 * * is composed of three parts. The logic part consists of 20 multiple-choice questions, each with 2 points and 40 points. Generally, there are 8 formal logics and 12 argumentation logics.

The math part includes 10 multiple-choice questions and 10 calculation questions. 2 points for each question in the radio section, 5 points for each calculation question, and 70 points for * *. In general, the proportion of subjects in advanced mathematics is 60%, and linear algebra and probability theory each account for 20%. The writing part includes an analysis of the validity of the argument and a short essay, each with 20 points and 40 points.

Debate logic

In the economic entrance examination, the proportion of argumentation logic is still relatively large. According to the outline, the main contents are:

1, demonstration mode analysis;

2. Demonstration and evaluation;

3. Three aspects of fallacy identification.

Which of these three parts is the key content and which part is more difficult? I believe this is a problem that most students are concerned about.

Among them, demonstration mode analysis is the basic requirement. For each argumentative topic, we need to master the corresponding analysis mode in order to get the topic right. This analysis method is easy to master, but how to apply it to argumentation evaluation and fallacy identification, Bian Xiao hereby offers the following suggestions for everyone:

1, pay attention to the practice of combing the argumentation process.

According to the outline, argumentation and evaluation include strengthening, weakening, explanation and other four parts. From the perspective of topic types, strengthening and weakening are the focus of investigation, so our review should focus on strengthening and weakening. For this kind of questions, we must be able to read the stem accurately and clarify the argumentation process of the stem.

To clarify the process of argument, we must master the structure of argument: topic, argument, argument, hypothesis and reasoning. In a topic, only arguments and arguments are often given, and everything else is implicit.

So what we need to do is to accurately identify arguments and arguments, and then sort out how arguments are derived. This process is clearly sorted out, and then combined with specific methods, such as how to strengthen and weaken the argument, how to strengthen and weaken the argument, you can basically choose the right option.

2. Accurately identify interference options.

According to the outline, the main types of fallacies reproduced in argumentation logic are: confusing concepts, shifting the subject, self-contradiction, ambiguity, improper analogy, generalizing the whole with the partial and so on.

Among them, there are relatively many confusing concepts, changing the subject and generalizing the whole. The concept in the option is often different from the question type, which is a common inspection method for proposers, mainly to examine the analysis and recognition ability of candidates.

Changing the topic means that the topic and stem of the option are not in a range, but if you want to strengthen or weaken an argument, you must ensure the consistency of the topic, otherwise you can neither strengthen nor weaken the argument of the stem of the topic, and this option can be directly ruled out.

Compared with these two kinds, we don't do too many tests, and this fallacy is easy to identify. Remember that definitions are basically recognizable.