Only by shaping ourselves can we be more capable, highlight ourselves, constantly sum up the methods of mathematics and improve the learning rules. I finished the exam an hour in advance, and I think I should get full marks when I leave the examination room. My score is 143, damn it. Who ate my score and then the difficulty of math 1 is different from that of math 2 and math 3. It is said that the score of Math III 140 is quite good (I heard). Because the entrance examination for mathematics is a comprehensive investigation, calculation, thinking and sensitivity to problems are all tested. The gap of one point will even affect whether the dream can finally come true. Therefore, math scores above 140 are absolutely dominant in the postgraduate entrance examination.
But first of all, everyone should understand that no matter how rich the book is, you can only enrich yourself by absorbing it. You know exactly what kind of questions can be tested for each knowledge point, so that you can do well in the real exam. Some math is not very good, but learning math can't always be responsive. If the latter suggests changing to a liberal arts major that doesn't take math, how many points do you want your subject to achieve? Set a small goal for yourself first, and then complete it step by step, which can improve the enthusiasm of learning.
But the number of people with this score is also the least. If you can score more than 400, it proves that you are really a great god. Should be able to participate in the second interview stably. With a score of 400+, it is unlikely that a single subject will not cross the line unless it is seriously biased. That's even harder. If there are scores in colleges and universities, it will be difficult for you to get 400+! Personal comprehensive ability is also average, and there is no comparability with those gifted scholars in the north of Qing Dynasty, so there is no strength.