As far as my personal analysis is concerned, Wu Yong Studio still has to bear most of the responsibility. First of all, it is illegal for him to operate without a license, and he will be punished in law. Secondly, there are so many indecent illustrations. Unexpectedly, these illustrations were used for more than ten years. In addition to Wu Yong's responsibility, some audit departments should also bear certain responsibilities. Sitting in the post of audit work, but not playing the role of audit, isn't this equivalent to eating empty salary?
Generally speaking, the official has not clearly announced who will be in charge of this matter. We can only wait for news and see how the court decides. But in this case, it has undoubtedly infringed on the psychological development of underage children. How can we establish a correct view of children from an early age in such an indecent illustration environment? This is a question worth pondering. The most terrible thing is that such indecent illustrations have existed for more than ten years, and I don't know how many children have been infringed. Personally, I think this matter must be traced to the end. If it is simply published and there are no other ideas, then it is no problem to punish it, but if there are other ideas behind it, it is another matter.