The basic knowledge here is not only the focus and difficulty of the textbook, but also several major frameworks stipulated in the syllabus, and it is not just the main knowledge of the subject that everyone often says. For history, it should include title, introduction, text, fine print, notes, materials (including words, images, situation maps, tables, etc. ) and after-school exercises.
From the title of each chapter to the introduction, we can often see the main context of this chapter; You don't have to remember every sentence in the textbook, but you should remember conclusive words, such as background, reasons, content, nature, influence, evaluation and other elements; The small print part of the textbook is often the development of the text part, and it also contains some important conclusive words, such as the qualitative analysis of the position of movable type in Xixia culture in the Song and Yuan Dynasties; Annotations should not only be regarded as explanatory words, but also as the deepening of text knowledge. For example, for Columbus' discovery of the new continent, the annotation gives an "objective historical progress based on unjust behavior", which helps us to dialectically evaluate the opening of new routes; The materials in the textbook not only provide rich historical facts, but also provide strong evidence for us to demonstrate historical conclusions; Practice after class should not be considered too naive. Some exercises can also deepen our understanding of historical knowledge, such as after-school exercises in the founding of the Republic of China and the Enlightenment.
When reading a book 90 days before the exam, we should not only grasp the points (knowledge points) but also pay attention to the aspects (comprehensiveness), so that when we close the book, we can accurately recall the specific knowledge of the relevant review chapters.
Second, establish special topics and reorganize the knowledge structure.
I mainly want to explain three points:
The first is the reorganization of the topic. It breaks the existing textbook framework and reorganizes according to some important clues, which is not only a process of knowledge re-skill, but also a process of cultivating students' ability to transfer and apply knowledge. For example, China's ancient history is divided into topics according to political system, economic development, ethnic relations, foreign exchanges, science and technology culture, and China's modern history is divided into topics according to foreign powers' invasion of China, China people's struggle and exploration, China's party history, and new China's economic policies in different periods. When writing special topics, don't ignore hot and cold, such as international sports and national liberation, which have been neglected for many years. Since 2006, the frequency of topics has increased.
The second is the timeliness of the topic (that is, hot spots). It is necessary to sum up long-term topics, such as land tax system at home and abroad related to the three rural issues, as well as industrialization, democratization and scientization related to the near modernization. Short-term topics should also be summarized, such as Chinese and foreign price issues related to rising prices, astronomical calendar issues related to Shenzhou and Chang 'e-1, people's livelihood issues related to the snowstorm in the south, and China * * * meeting issues related to the two sessions.
The third is the plainness of the topic. No matter how good the topic is, it is also based on a comprehensive, complete and accurate review of the basic knowledge. Simply relying on the topic can only be a castle in the air, so we can neither blindly pursue the novelty of the topic nor generalize the topic as a panacea, which mainly reflects the main knowledge and basic conclusions; At present, there is a new proposition trend in the college entrance examination of literature and comprehensive science, which is to dilute the consciousness of special topics. For example, in 2007, the multiple-choice part of the first volume of Wenzong did not reflect other special clues except the military system.
Third, strengthen practice, focusing on methods and skills.
In today's information society, there are a lot of test questions in books and newspapers online, but students' time is limited, and their school situation and class situation are different. We should choose novel topics of different grades according to students' specific conditions, and try our best to achieve new materials, new angles, clear methods and emphasis on foundation. When evaluating exercises, methods are more important than answers.
For example, the multiple-choice questions in the history college entrance examination in the state of comprehensive literature can be roughly divided into narrative, reason, best, opposite, combination and material. The overall method is: remember accurately and use vividly. For example, multiple-choice questions with reasons should distinguish the meanings of different restrictive terms such as direct reason, main reason, root cause, objective reason and subjective reason. There is no other reason between the direct cause and the occurrence of historical events, and the main reason should be found among many reasons. The fundamental reasons are often decisive factors, such as historical background, productivity conditions, economic development level, class status and so on. Objective reasons mainly refer to external environment, while subjective reasons mainly refer to internal efforts.
Another example is to teach students how to summarize the main points of the material, how to think clearly about the restrictions, how to contact the textbook knowledge, and how to simply answer questions with historical terms. Many students are comfortable reading classical Chinese and modern Chinese on Chinese test papers, and they are afraid when they see historical material questions. One of the methods I use to guide students is "playing hardball with both hands": opening China's knife and applying historical medicine (summing up material viewpoints by induction in Chinese and answering with history textbook knowledge or historical terms). The second is the "four steps": regression, thinking, combination and transformation (summarizing the main points of materials, thinking clearly about restrictions, connecting with textbook knowledge and simplifying historical terms), in which thinking and transformation are particularly important. If you don't think clearly about the restrictive language such as time, space and connotation, even the answer is futile; If you don't make up the serial number, you will get a lower actual score in the college entrance examination with concise and clear answers in historical terms. Therefore, I ask students to think clearly, clearly and thoroughly about the materials, and to give short, flat and quick answers.
On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently.
On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently.
On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently. On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently.
On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently.
On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently.
On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently.
On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently.
On the root of returning to textbooks from the comparison of syllabus and research questions
In the review process, a considerable number of candidates will abandon their textbooks and leave their teachers for so-called "independent" review, which is likely to be futile because of the lack of systematicness and pertinence.
Through the research outline and the college entrance examination questions, we can find an important law of all the college entrance examination questions: the teaching material is the birthplace of the college entrance examination questions. For many years, an unchanging principle of college entrance examination questions is "taking materials from textbooks, but not sticking to textbooks". Every example and exercise in the textbook has its purpose and function, and many college entrance examination questions can be found in the textbook. Many college entrance examination questions are the deformation, transformation and synthesis of the original teaching materials.
At the same time, by studying the examination syllabus and the sixth set of questions, we can find that the examination syllabus does not ignore every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, but the specific requirements are different; If we study the exam questions of NMET, we can find that for every knowledge point in the middle school mathematics textbook, we may miss some knowledge points from a set of test papers ("not deliberately pursuing the coverage of knowledge"), but vertically, we will pay attention to the coverage of knowledge in different years, and some counseling materials may miss some knowledge points. Therefore, in the sprint preparation, we must return to textbooks and study the formation, development and expansion of knowledge.
Optimize the review process by checking loopholes and filling gaps against the syllabus.
In order to effectively examine the needs of innovation ability, the current college entrance examination is bound to have novel topics. This kind of problem is actually that everyone is on the same starting line; However, if you have a solid basic knowledge, skilled problem-solving methods and calm down in the examination room, it is easy to find a breakthrough in solving problems. The current college entrance examination questions are generally "wide in entrance and difficult in depth", so it is easy to get seven or eight points, but difficult to get full marks. So how can we achieve a decisive victory in the 2008 college entrance examination? The secret is "get all the points you deserve". This requires you to check and fill the gaps and fight against mistakes. This book is a comprehensive interpretation of the college entrance examination. Therefore, we can check for leaks and fill gaps according to the main line of the sample questions in the book. First, cover the analysis of "sample questions" with a white paper. After reading the sample questions, do it yourself. For the questions that can't be done, think after reading the analysis: where is the card? Which knowledge point is not related? Which method didn't come to mind? ..... Even if you do it right, you should study the "comments" carefully. Have you mastered the exam requirements mentioned in the comments? Can the summarized thinking method be used? ..... The above-mentioned failure to grasp the convenience is the defect and loophole of your knowledge network, so mark it well and review it frequently.