Personally, I think one-on-one tutoring is definitely better. After all, one-on-one tutoring should be more professional. If many people tutor, the effect will not be so good, which is more suitable for students with poor skills.
First, one-on-one tutoring is better.
One-on-one tutoring is certainly helpful to students, because the teacher is targeting at one student, not many classmates, and his attention will definitely focus on one student, so that a student can teach effectively. Some children have really poor math foundation. If it is taught in a large class, it is easy to be ignored by other students with good skills, so one-on-one tutoring can improve the attention of children.
Second, one-on-one tutoring for children is more acceptable.
Sometimes children don't like to choose to improve their math scores in large classes, because some children are shy and always don't want to ask teachers or classmates when they encounter problems, so problems will accumulate. At this time, parents can arrange one-on-one counseling for their children. One-on-one tutoring, some children may be more willing to accept some. After all, teachers can educate children in detail, and students can ask teachers in time when they encounter problems.
Third, one-on-one special counseling
One-on-one tutoring can train children specially, because if children make mistakes in concentrated math problems, teachers can train children intensively. Moreover, when teachers face students, they can train them wholeheartedly. Children can accept this kind of pay, and you are willing to accept it. Therefore, in this case, children's learning ability can be improved, which is of great benefit to children and is of great help to improve their math scores.