Consciousness is consciousness and the function of concept understanding. At least as early as the period of yoga and Veda, people often explored and described the process of understanding.

David kolb's experiential learning (1984) introduced a mathematical model to link learning style with learning process. Although there are some embarrassing places, on the whole, this is a well-thought-out idea. The chart on the right is more comprehensive, showing that modeling can be traced back to the ancient yoga tradition. It has also been independently copied in many other philosophical and historical records.

This picture comes from our book Love and Consciousness. In addition to rotating like a mathematical model, it also contains a meaningful axis about how we evaluate things and the nature of our experience. It also includes the perspective of motivation/development, and each learning stage provides a transition. Finally, there are 12 generalization stages of Cualla.

This model reminds us of the mathematical relationship between quantum mechanics and consciousness. Of course, people who paid attention to this point for most of the last century have expected it. In fact, this is a key gimmick named "Psychological History" used by isaac asimov and his publisher friend Campbell when they first conceived the famous foundation series in 194 1. Ironically, we developed this model before we understood Asimov's idea.

I personally entered this subject because I studied physics and just wanted to know myself and other scientists. You can imagine my surprise when I noticed that I could relate these variables well. This is a great gospel, because because of the limitation of reproducibility, psychology is difficult to analyze by mathematical methods. But physics is completely reproducible. So, after decades of screening, what have I learned?

There are too many lists here, but I can give some key points.

Consciousness, like the universe, is too complicated for linear systems. Only adaptive and object-oriented architecture can handle modeling reasonably. In this way, each stage of epistemology is regarded as a constantly changing polyhedron.

The communication of understanding, light and other functions requires the shaping degree of an illusory element (feeling, creativity). From the social point of view, a certain degree of ignorance and myth is necessary. However, you don't want to be so big as to lead to unsustainable differentiation (ignorance).

If you are too rigid in mathematics, you will miss that the contextual perspective of QM details affects the behavior of each variable to some extent. This involves a physical platform, a system connected by its unit parts and relative to its unit parts, which spans all changes from concept to death. Changing the perspective array adds its own mass to the input.

If the imaginary axis is not considered, the Turing test cannot pass. It is very important for social control to fill these omissions with myths and legends. The easiest way to create a functional omission is to fill in the blanks with a story or some kind of error message.

Summary of sensibility (information that combines mental/ideological units with processing/sensory processes, etc.). ) Follow this model, starting with environmental dynamics, then paying attention to the identity as a spatial unit, and from there turning to greater functional openness.

In other words, when you study and concentrate, you become a refined information body. In order to play a role, your knowledge must be decomposed into low potential, so that the work potential can flow. Mastery is not knowing or seeing everything, but the ability to realize it in the situation.