2。 Doing real questions is absolutely effective. However, I think this method of repeatedly doing multiple sets of real questions is ineffective.

This is what I did when I reviewed the SAT last year: I did one or two sets of real questions every weekend.

Then if you are free, do some simulation questions until a few days before the exam.

I have never done a set of questions over and over again. Because I know all the answers to those questions, what's the use of doing it?

The only advantage of doing real questions repeatedly is that you will be more familiar with the format and topic type of SAT.

Because you do more real questions, you will know more about the general problems of Collegeboard.

Although I think the best way to review the SAT is to do the questions, don't repeat them completely.

Did you buy Collegeboard's OG? Did you buy any books from Princeton? Or Barons' reading comprehension book?

If not, I suggest you buy all three.

Then count several sets of questions, plan by yourself, and do several sets every week until a few days before the exam.

Then the rest of the time is spent reciting words. Some SAT words are quite difficult, so you'd better recite more words.

If you want to get high marks, you must do the questions, and the more questions you do, the better.

But it's really useless to do the real questions over and over again. Because you also said that if you do too much, you have to rely on memory, which is boring.

It is better to use your own time to do several different sets of questions, whether they are real questions or simulation questions.