Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Mathematics proposition teacher in college entrance examination
Mathematics proposition teacher in college entrance examination
A wave of unrest, another wave. The storm of perfect composition in Zhejiang college entrance examination has not yet subsided, and the mathematics proposers in Zhejiang college entrance examination have been questioned by acupuncture training institutions, which makes people wonder whether it will affect the fairness of the college entrance examination. Frankly speaking, this influence is still small, but the college entrance examination proposition is a serious matter and there are relevant regulations. Relevant personnel and institutions should also avoid suspicion, otherwise even if there is no interest behind it, it is difficult to avoid all kinds of doubts.

First, the mathematics proposition of the college entrance examination is pointed to acupoints.

According to the Beijing News, Li, the former math proposer of the college entrance examination in Zhejiang, was accused of teaching in a training institution for a long time, and the business scope of the institution involved included the sprint project of the college entrance examination.

Li, promoted to professor and doctoral supervisor in 2000, has been teaching in the Mathematics Department of Zhejiang University since September 2000 1997. Now he is a professor at the School of Mathematical Sciences, and his research interests are financial mathematics and partial differential equations. A lot of information shows that he is the proposer of mathematics in Zhejiang college entrance examination.

Another important identity of Li is a part-time employee of an off-campus training institution. Two staff members of the training institution said that Li was in the institution? Teaching for many years? Time is generally concentrated during the long vacation, mainly teaching intensive math classes, and most students are in the second and third grades. According to the courses of training institutions, Professor Li's courses were held in September 20 15, August 20 19 and June 20 19 respectively.

Second, is Lee still possible? More than a teacher?

The staff of the training institution said that Li was more than just a teacher. What does that mean? It is understood that the legal person of this institution is not Li, and among the shareholders of this institution is Liu Guimei, accounting for about 40% of the shares. In the periodical information query, it was found that an author named Liu Guimei had published three papers with Li, and Liu Guimei worked in Zhejiang University around 20 15. From this point of view, it is not excluded that Li has a further relationship with this institution.

Third, does the proposition of the college entrance examination affect the fairness of the college entrance examination?

Is it compliant for college entrance examination proposers to participate in training programs of training institutions? This is a minority rule, and there is no public information at present. However, it is generally believed that the members of the college entrance examination proposition group need to sign a confidentiality agreement, and the proposer shall not participate in various business activities related to the college entrance examination proposition within three years, let alone be used for various enrollment propaganda.

If Li has been taking part in the mathematics proposition of the college entrance examination in recent years, it is really inappropriate to participate in the activities of training institutions. In a sense, it will affect the fairness of the college entrance examination. The members of the proposition group are familiar with the grasp and trend of the math problems in the college entrance examination, at least much more powerful than ordinary teachers.

Therefore, as long as the college entrance examination proposition is involved, the marking staff had better be cautious and cautious, and may have the intention of sharing, but it is difficult for onlookers not to imagine the problems behind them. When a coach is a referee, it is easy to make fairness unprotected. what do you think? Welcome to leave a message for discussion!