Why did some people work very hard in World War I and almost failed in the postgraduate entrance examination? They were lax in World War II and a little tired of learning. And some people lost in World War I and worked hard in World War II? Some people took the postgraduate entrance examination. Because they are full of confidence in the postgraduate entrance examination, they are full of hard work and fantasize about the scene after they are admitted, and the schools they apply for are not particularly fierce. If you work hard, you can be admitted, and some of you can be admitted to your own school. The admission score is particularly low, and you can be admitted if you basically cross the line. So they were hardly accepted in World War I, so they did quite well in World War I, and I began to be proud in World War II. Did not learn the lessons of World War I, blindly arrogant. I thought I could get in with my eyes closed after studying for a year. Some schools look down on the schools I applied to before, and I am going to apply to some famous schools and competitive schools. It's more difficult, so I don't want to learn after learning. Everything else is a cross-examination and self-study. I studied for another year. There will be no psychological pressure. The real reason is that the difficulty and assessment point of the paper are changing, and your teacher knows you better than yourself.

Some people have set their goals, and they must take the postgraduate entrance examination and be admitted. Although the first world war almost, but through hard work can be admitted to World War II.