Second, three sets of papers are used in different regions and provinces. The use of several volumes of the national college entrance examination changes slightly every year. 20 18 Usage of Volume I, II and III in China:
Applicable areas of the first volume in China: Guangdong, Henan, Hebei, Shanxi, Jiangxi, Hubei, Hunan, Anhui, Fujian and Shandong.
Applicable areas of the second volume of the country: Gansu, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Shaanxi and Chongqing.
Applicable areas of the national three volumes: Yunnan, Guangxi, Guizhou, Sichuan and Tibet.
20 17 domestic usage of volume 1, volume 2 and volume 3;
China Volume I Region: Fujian, Henan, Hebei, Shanxi, Jiangxi, Hubei, Hunan, Guangdong and Anhui.
National Volume II: Gansu, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Tibet, Shaanxi and Chongqing.
Three volumes of China: Yunnan, Guangxi, Guizhou and Sichuan.
Provinces with independent propositions: Jiangsu, Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Zhejiang.
Some provinces that use the national volume: Hainan Province: the national volume (Chinese, mathematics, English) has separate topics (politics, history, geography, things, culture, life).
Shandong Volume: National Volume (Foreign Language, Literature Comprehensive, Science Comprehensive) Independent Proposition (Chinese, Literature Comprehensive, Science Comprehensive)
Third, why use the national college entrance examination? It is the necessity of the development history of the college entrance examination system and the need to improve the quality of basic education and higher education in the future, which has far-reaching significance.
First, it strengthens the "unity" of China's college entrance examination system.
As far as the social transition period in China is concerned, only the college entrance examination is the strictest, the most sacred and the fairest, which is the common sense of the society. In the past, the unified proposition of provinces was conducive to mobilizing local enthusiasm and reflecting the imbalance of cultural education in different places according to local conditions, which was fair and reasonable to some extent. However, it is not conducive to the "national chess game" of the college entrance examination and to the high unity of the development of basic education and higher education in the whole country.
Second, it is conducive to improving the quality of propositions and saving the cost of propositions.
In fact, each province has its own way of proposition, and the principle, policy and form of proposition are very different, and the quality of proposition is high or low. National proposition can concentrate the superior resources of the whole country, and the quality and level of proposition are high. At the same time, the college entrance examination proposition needs a certain amount of manpower and material resources, and it costs money. The scattered proposition in each province increases the cost of the national college entrance examination proposition, which is not in line with the "saving" spirit of the country and society.
Third, it is conducive to promoting basic education and selecting talents in colleges and universities.
The proposition of college entrance examination is a work with strong policy and technology. Proposition principle and proposition orientation, like batons, have great influence on China's basic education. Question type, structure combination and distribution, difficulty of question type, etc. , are not sure. Each province's proposition is its own, and it is difficult to grasp the "degree" by overemphasizing the "regionality" and "difference" of the place. Therefore, the scores of college entrance examination vary greatly among provinces, which is not conducive to narrowing the differences in culture and education, improving the quality of basic education in the country and selecting talents in colleges and universities.
The implementation of the national unified proposition will make candidates and parents have some anxiety or worry, thinking that the difficulty of the national examination paper will increase and the provincial control score will increase. This is actually a misunderstanding.
The national proposition is based on the unified national examination syllabus and unified teaching materials, and the standard of the proposition is also unified. The national examination center and proposition experts will comprehensively consider and accurately grasp the proposition policy and orientation, proposition principles and ideas, proposition forms and effects from the national level and the future development requirements of the country.
The quality and level of the proposition will be higher. High does not mean that the test questions are difficult. On the other hand, there will be no problems, let alone digressions and strange questions, but for the majority of candidates, it is moderately difficult to fully consider the regional differences in China. Moderation means fairness, science and rationality, and the most fundamental point is to fully embody the "double basics", that is, to master basic knowledge and apply basic skills. So candidates and parents don't have to worry.
Of course, the college entrance examination is a selective examination after all, and the principles embodied in the national and provincial papers should be consistent, that is, the proposition should reflect a certain degree of discrimination, that is, the test questions will be easy to difficult, and the candidates' scores will form obvious levels and gradients, which is conducive to the selection and admission of different universities. Some people say that it is "unfair across the board", but in fact, the national examination paper is used, but the scores are still set by the provinces. College enrollment plan or provincial plan?
;