In this regard, many netizens interpret the management of off-campus training institutions as "eliminating pornography and illegal publications" and call it a great insult to off-campus training institutions. In fact, the governance of off-campus training institutions is mainly carried out by the education department and the market supervision department. The office of "Combating pornography and illegal publications" participates in inspections, mainly to check the sales and gifts of illegal publications by training institutions. So? There is no need to over-interpret this. However, it is necessary to be vigilant that the relevant departments have the intention to strengthen the inclusion of off-campus training institutions in the governance of "eliminating pornography and illegal publications" and conduct on-site inspections of off-campus training institutions in the name of "eliminating pornography and illegal publications", which on the one hand interferes with the legitimate operation of off-campus training institutions, on the other hand, it also stigmatizes off-campus training institutions.
According to the previous "double reduction" opinion, the state allows legal off-campus training institutions to exist, but prohibits off-campus discipline training institutions from listing, financing and capitalization, and may not carry out discipline training on holidays, weekends and winter and summer vacations, as well as education that exceeds the standard and exceeds the standard. ? Guarantee the right to operate legal off-campus discipline training institutions according to law. As an off-campus training institution to meet the differentiated choices of the educated, it is also a part of education in China. No matter how the school education is reformed and the quality of education is improved, it cannot meet the individualized education needs of all the educated.
Objectively speaking, because some off-campus training institutions have the problem of selling or giving away learning materials without official publication numbers to students and parents, it is legal for the office to participate in joint inspections. According to reports, the "anti-pornography" of the "anti-pornography" office refers to the removal of books, periodicals, audio-visual products, electronic publications and pornographic information that endanger people's physical and mental health and pollute the social and cultural environment on the Internet. "Illegal publications" refers to cracking down on illegal publications, that is, cracking down on publications that violate the provisions of the Constitution of People's Republic of China (PRC), undermine social stability, endanger national security and incite ethnic division, infringing and pirated publications and other illegal publications.
However, the high-profile emphasis on the inspection of off-campus training institutions by the office of "eliminating pornography and illegal publications" will often brand off-campus training institutions. ? The government's governance of off-campus training institutions is to cope with the educational anxiety and student training burden brought by "national training", and does not deny the educational value of legal off-campus training. Through governance, off-campus training institutions should return to their proper positions. Instead of "sweeping" off-campus training institutions.
According to relevant statistics, there are tens of millions of employees in off-campus training institutions, and the current governance should also consider the livelihood and outlet of employees in the training industry. Undoubtedly, some off-campus training institutions have problems of capitalization and excessive profit-seeking. However, most employees of off-campus education and training institutions are engaged in education, and they must not stigmatize their careers. If the regulatory authorities equate off-campus training institutions with vulgar industry governance, it is disrespect for the legitimate management rights of off-campus training institutions. The supervision of off-campus training institutions must be carried out according to law.
What needs to be more vigilant is that in order to control the possible trend of parents transferring private education and training to the underground, some places regard the inspection of underground training as the responsibility of the office of "eliminating pornography and illegal publications" and mobilize parents to report. ? If this happens, it is definitely not good governance.
To alleviate parents' demand for off-campus training, we can't chase and block parents' training demand in various extreme ways, which only shows that there are problems in counseling, including school education and summer trusteeship service, which can't meet students' needs. It is more important than managing off-campus education and training institutions to improve the quality of school education and reform the education management and evaluation system. If school education can be personalized, education will no longer play the role of social stratification, and students' choices for success will become diversified, will parents still have such a strong training demand?