In the past 30 years of reform and opening up, China's army building has made great progress, which is closely related to the 10,000 active servicemen in Qian Qian and every soldier who has contributed to the army. In the new century and new historical period, soldiers should shoulder new historical missions and complete historical tasks that have not been completed or will be completed in the past. However, relying solely on traditional political education and patriotic military education is far from stimulating the potential and creativity of soldiers. We must reposition the value of soldiers and re-examine the latest original free model essay! Only by attaching importance to military ethics, starting from soldiers and taking soldiers as the foundation can we ensure the leap-forward development of army building.
We have always stressed that soldiers should make contributions, but soldiers are people first. Scientific Outlook on Development demanded that the fundamental interests of the people should always be safeguarded. Soldiers defend the country, the people and the safety of the people. So, are soldiers a special group divorced from the people? We can't deny the commonness of soldiers as human beings just because of their special occupation. Soldiers are human beings, and Scientific Outlook on Development should also safeguard the fundamental interests of soldiers. In order for soldiers to have correct values, not only the army itself should realize the value of soldiers, but also the highest level of the country and the Lebanese people should realize the value of soldiers in order to truly reflect the value of soldiers. Soldiers are human beings, so they have any needs of normal people. Moreover, the particularity of military occupation leads to more intense and more demand for military personnel than ordinary people. However, the soldiers in China did not get a reasonable supply to meet their needs, which led to an extreme imbalance between the demand and supply of soldiers. According to Maslow's "hierarchy of needs" theory, people's basic needs are physiological needs and survival needs. Let's put aside our physical needs and talk about survival. There is no doubt that soldiers are provided by the state and there is no need to consider the issue of survival. What about the quality of life? We are talking about a well-off society and a general improvement in people's living standards. It seems that all this excludes soldiers, only that soldiers should contribute at any time and place, but it is far from enough to support them. Of course, China soldiers know that China is still in the primary stage of socialism, China's market economy is still far from perfect, and there are tens of millions of poor people in the country, so China soldiers can endure and contribute, but it does not mean that China soldiers can only endure and contribute. The lack of effective incentives for military personnel is a great hidden danger for the country. Our soldiers in China are children of the people, workers, peasants and intellectuals. Our soldiers are more aware of the hardships of their parents, and they hope that the people of the whole country will live a rich and well-off life. However, the patience and dedication of soldiers can not make ordinary people in the country enter a well-off society, nor can they lift tens of millions of poor people out of poverty. Therefore, soldiers should not be blindly patient and dedicated. Although the value of a soldier cannot be measured by money, it is inestimable. In order for soldiers to show their value, the whole society should respect them. First of all, we should understand soldiers from the perspective of human nature, admit and meet their objective needs, let soldiers realize the highest needs of people mentioned in Maslow's "demand theory"-self-realization and self-worth, build a harmonious army in a harmonious society, and make the green of military camps a harmonious color of society.
Morality is a conscious thing. It is against the law of human development to talk about soldiers' morality without the soldiers themselves. The morality of soldiers is based on understanding and embodying its value. If soldiers can't get equal compensation, then soldiers' morality is not binding and convincing to soldiers. In the past, we always gave moral education to soldiers and told them what to do. But now, it seems that these educations have little incentive effect on soldiers, but have caused resistance from many soldiers. For most people, joining the army is still a means of making a living. Only by solving the problem of survival can we advocate military morality. But survival alone cannot solve the moral problems of soldiers. The army is not a vacuum, and soldiers are not transcendental saints. In economics, Engel's coefficient is usually used to measure the living standard. A large Engel's coefficient indicates that the most basic living expenses are high and the living standard is low. At present, the main expenditure of soldiers in China is the necessities of life, and the living expenses account for a large proportion of all family expenditures, with a large Engel coefficient, so it can be said that the living standard and quality are very low. Even, many soldiers are rushing for the livelihood of their families all day. It is conceivable that under such conditions, how can soldiers love their jobs and have correct professional ethics? As the old saying goes, there is a brave man under the four rewards, and the modern new military revolution is a competition for talents. Reasonable material incentives are the foundation, and reasonable spiritual incentives can help soldiers establish correct professional ethics.
The army is a functional department that carries out special tasks of the state, and it can also be said that it is a large collective owned by the state. In order to make this big group produce better benefits, we must make the members of the group love this group and let them have a strong sense of belonging in this group. Only in this way can we build this collective well, better exercise our functions and complete the tasks entrusted by the state. Therefore, the army itself must rationally allocate military human resources. At present, the phenomenon of brain drain in our army is quite serious. Even some senior technicians who stayed in the army did not play their due role. The reason why so many outstanding military talents have left the army is not only because of the low salary of the army, but also because the army itself cannot make good use of these talents. In order to make everyone in the army have a sense of professional belonging, we must decide their remuneration, reward and promotion according to the actual situation and characteristics of each soldier. It is necessary to fully understand the personal needs and career development aspirations of military talents, provide them with various development opportunities, create the greatest space for their development talents, let all kinds of military talents clearly see their development prospects in the army, and enhance their motivation to do their best for the modernization of the army.
At the present stage, the outstanding problems in the talent construction of our army are that it can't be people-oriented and can't use people reasonably, especially the use of highly educated and high-quality talents is inappropriate. Many units only pay lip service to talents and pay too much attention to the number of talents, without really using talents rationally. For example, some units emphasize the talent construction project, and the number of doctors, masters and undergraduates in propaganda units is only a collection of numbers, but they are not allowed to play their professional expertise. Many soldiers with master's and doctoral degrees have different jobs and majors, so what they have learned is useless. This will inevitably hit the sense of professional belonging of military talents and easily lead to their loss. In some units, it happens from time to time that masters and doctors will leave the army even if they are punished. While emphasizing the importance of talents, we don't use talents, which has become an important obstacle to the modernization of our army. Only by attaching importance to and advocating the flow of military talents, especially those with high academic qualifications, can we avoid the phenomenon that some units lack people and some units waste talents, so that talents are always in an active state and enhance their vitality. It is conceivable that if many important positions in the army are filled with highly educated soldiers, the modernization of the army will be greatly improved. We can't fully agree with the absolute correctness of "elite running the country" and "elite running the army", but we should realize the irreplaceable role of "elite" with high academic qualifications in running the country and the army. They are the fundamental pillars to improve the combat effectiveness and military deterrence of the army.
Generally speaking, Scientific Outlook on Development can't just stay on the slogan. People-oriented, in the army is based on soldiers. Only by giving soldiers reasonable material treatment, optimizing the allocation of military human resources, giving full play to their talents and developing in an all-round and coordinated way can soldiers create and enhance their value, and their moral values and sense of professional belonging will inevitably be enhanced.