Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Education and training - Why don't teachers be allowed to make up lessons paid, while educational institutions can offer make-up lessons?
Why don't teachers be allowed to make up lessons paid, while educational institutions can offer make-up lessons?
According to the relevant regulations of the education department, in-service teachers are not allowed to make up lessons with compensation. If in-service teachers make up lessons with compensation, it is a violation of discipline and discipline, and teachers themselves will be punished accordingly. The reason why educational institutions can run cram schools is mainly because educational institutions have obtained the legal right to operate, which is legal and does not violate the regulations of the education department and relevant state departments. In view of this problem, the craftsman teacher shares some personal opinions below.

First, not all teachers are not allowed to make up lessons. The education department clearly stipulates that only in-service teachers are not allowed to make up classes. If you are a retired teacher, you can make up lessons for your students. Retired teachers have teacher qualification certificates and many years of rich teaching experience. By making up lessons for students, you can not only enrich your old age, but also earn some money.

For in-service teachers, they must abide by the relevant regulations given by the education department and cannot make up lessons for students. Individual in-service teachers clearly know that it is unreasonable to make up lessons with pay, but they still make up lessons with pay. In fact, this will not only make you face relevant punishment, but also lead to serious unemployment.

In recent years, the education department has also severely cracked down on the illegal activities of in-service teachers to make up lessons with compensation. Therefore, I hope that every in-service teacher can regulate his behavior and not make up lessons for personal gain in exchange for compensation, which not only harms students, but also harms himself.

Second, it is unfair to other students for teachers to make up lessons with compensation. Some teachers don't focus on teaching students in class, but make up lessons for students privately and charge parents. They can only teach students important knowledge points if they make up lessons with compensation. It is unreasonable for the teacher to do so, and it is unfair to other students. Some teachers even charge students and parents tuition fees, so in-service teachers will be prohibited from making up lessons with pay.

Third, educational institutions are legal institutions and can offer cram schools. Different from in-service teachers, educational institutions are legal institutions, with legal management rights and formal business licenses. They offer cram schools, provide their own teaching services and charge students and parents a certain fee. This is also a very reasonable thing. After all, cram schools provide venues and teaching materials, as well as teachers' teaching services, so students and parents should be charged a certain tuition fee. Moreover, the cram schools offered by educational institutions have really helped many students improve their academic performance and solved their parents' problems. Therefore, students and parents do not exclude the existence of cram schools. It is precisely because students and parents have relevant needs that cram schools have always existed.

So what do you think of this problem? You are welcome to express your different views and opinions in the comments section below.