However, many good in-service teachers can find students without going to training institutions because of their cohesion. Therefore, in general, the level of teachers in training institutions cannot and cannot be compared with that of teachers in in-service schools.
In addition, children's study in training institutions is far less than that in on-the-job schools in terms of study time and focus on cultivating children's study habits.
Public teachers are very strict, especially in high schools. Each teacher mainly studies university topics. The school only requires each teacher to do his own subject well, and it will never be like the so-called "universal counseling" of the "universal oil" teachers in training institutions. Several of my classmates were confused in high school and got more than 270 points in the college entrance examination. Later, they worked as English teachers in a training institution in Guiyang, the provincial capital, and collected them in a circle of friends every day.
Basically, as long as it is a large class or a middle class or a small class, it will not help students much, whether inside or outside the school! The improvement of scores is purely accidental and has nothing to do with learning interest and learning ability!
The best situation is that the teacher at school knows the reason why I am weak in learning, because she can observe my dynamics all day, but her ability to solve symptoms is insufficient! Because she has to put her limited energy and time on the affairs of the class and top students, it is impossible to make a comprehensive solution for me and implement it!
Who is the teacher of the training institution or the teacher of the school? It's hard to say, because teachers in any training institution can't represent the level of teachers in the whole training institution, and the level of teachers in training institutions is very different. Similarly, the same is true of school teachers. No one can represent the level of the whole school teachers. Without such samples, there is no way to compare them.
However, on the whole, it can be compared, comparing the group level of teachers in training institutions and school teachers. This comparison is also very subjective, and different people will come to completely different conclusions.
If you are in a low-level school, your teachers are low-level; if you are in a high-level school, your teachers are high-level. Similarly, your teachers in low-level training institutions are low-level, while those in high-level training institutions are relatively high-level. There is no comparability between the two.
In addition, we can't judge the teacher's level subjectively. It depends on students' feedback. Whether a teacher is good or not depends on the students' judgment. Many good students can be taught, and the students themselves think the teacher is very good.
To be honest, I don't think this question makes much sense, but there are some things to share with parents.
1. Teachers in training institutions are also mixed. In order to reduce costs, some training institutions will invite some college students to attend classes. Because college students and children are close in age, they are easy to get along well and children like them easily. Many parents only ask their children if they like to make up lessons here. When a child says he likes it, he says the teacher is of high level. In fact, these people have little teaching experience and fail to grasp the key and difficult points. If an experienced and well-taught teacher can explain thoroughly in one class, it is estimated that parents can't see two classes.
2. Many training institutions invite in-service teachers, because many parents require in-service teachers to report classes, but it is relatively expensive for in-service teachers to make up lessons.
3. Some training institutions can help you score points, and there are also small class system or one-on-one reasons.