After attending kindergarten, many teachers will tell their parents directly when communicating with them. Parents should actively cooperate with teachers, and there should be no situation where teachers teach one thing and parents teach another, which will greatly reduce children's learning efficiency.

Just like being educated at school five days a week, teachers help children develop study habits and living habits, because there is no one to supervise and restrain them after going home on weekends, which leads to failure and has to start again after returning to school.

Even if the teacher has enough patience to correct the child again and again, the child may not take the initiative to cooperate with the teacher! This may be an instinctive choice for people to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, but how discriminating can children be?

Still need the supervision of parents.

Isn't the purpose of school education to make children live better?

What is the purpose of students' education? They have higher quality, knowledge and broad vision, and after accumulating certain skills, isn't it convenient for them to get better life and life choices? Become a useful person.

Moreover, school education will make children pay more attention to their studies and let them know that after entering the campus, student life will officially begin and they should cheer up every day. Family education after returning to China is just a new way of learning. Are all the life skills they learn in daily life useless knowledge?

Family education VS school education, which has a greater impact on children?

Compared from the beginning: family education is earlier and deeper.

They have been dealing with their parents every day since their children were born. Parents will continue to help them develop various abilities and life experiences, and learn to climb, sit, stand and walk, all of which are important components of education. After all, these skills are accumulated by children from scratch.

It is no exaggeration to say that family education began before the child was born.

For example, the prenatal education that parents give their children outside their stomachs, the thoughts and thoughts of mothers, and even the big and small things that they experience every day are all education in other ways.

This is something that school education can't compare with and catch up with. After all, the earliest time limit for receiving school education is the 2-year-old early education class. The gap between these two years can not be easily surpassed in a short time. This is also a measure!

Compared with the efficiency of education, school education is more efficient.

When receiving school education, we will perceive children's learning effect more intuitively and quickly, in which academic performance is an important criterion. It is easy for parents to equate grades with effects, and children with high grades feel that the better the effects are.

Although this is one-sided, it is true that students' learning attitude can be judged by their grades. Children with a correct attitude are not allowed to achieve too dazzling results. After all, the educational content of the school is unchanged. If you put your heart into it, your grades will be improved easily.

Family education is very extensive. There are no textbooks and grading standards. Even parents don't grade their children and label them. They have always held the idea that learning is the best, learning is not the best, and it is reasonable for children to be incorrect.

The relationship between the two has always been harmonious.

If the family education fails, no matter how hard the school education works, the result will be embarrassing, just like sending a child who doesn't like learning at all to focus on learning and edifying. Isn't the result casting pearls before swine?

Moreover, both family and school are important parts of children's growth. Which part will produce the butterfly effect, or it needs the close cooperation between parents and schools.