I think this question is too absolute, I can't vote, because no money is a relative concept in my opinion. Compared with people who earn millions a year, two or three thousand a month can be considered as having no money, but compared with people who have no income at all at the bottom of society, two or three thousand a month can be called a well-off society! So how can you have no money to have children across the board? Instead of asking this question, why don't you ask how much you earn before you can have children? Besides, having children is a natural human right. Since it is a human right, whether children can be born should not be divided according to economic conditions.

Fortunately, with the progress of society, in our era, as long as the limbs are sound, even without education and resources, we can live a relatively good life entirely by manual labor! My hometown is in the countryside, and I know many farmers and migrant workers who work in cities. They supported the whole family and raised their children with their own hands. Maybe they don't provide rich material conditions for their children, but as long as they can provide them with three meals a day, formal education and the company of their parents, it is possible for them to go out of the countryside and find a job in the city. Isn't this a success? In my opinion, this is not only his success, but even the success of his whole family, because through his continuous efforts, he not only supported his children, but also improved their lives a lot.

On the other hand, I have seen many such families. The family's economic conditions are not bad, and parents provide their children with rich material conditions. In addition, their investment is almost zero. When children are two or three years old, they are allowed to stay with their parents without companionship. For children, they have never established a good relationship with their parents since childhood. When the children go to school, send them to school, and everything will be left to the school. Usually they never ask about their studies. When they fail in the exam, they either beat or scold. When the child is rebellious in adolescence, his temper is worse than that of the child, and there is no rational education ... Although such a family is rich in economy, should such parents have children?

Therefore, material conditions should not be the only criterion for having children.