The idea itself is a paradox. From the moment the child is born, the starting line of life has been decided. All kinds of training we gave our children in the later period were just a compensatory measure for them. Whether this kind of compensation is useful is worth considering.
If a child doesn't even have a childhood life when he grows up, recalling childhood is nothing more than brushing questions at school, spending a lot of time in training classes that he doesn't like, and doing various things according to his parents' wishes and requirements under the pressure of his parents. Such a childhood is not happy at all.
Even if they succeed later, they will not thank their parents for cultivating their childhood, but will think that their parents deprived them of their childhood. The existence of early education institutions like this is in line with parents' anxiety about educating their children.
Children's growth has natural laws. It is absolutely unnecessary to force him to learn so much knowledge at a young age. He can't digest these things at all The so-called early education institutions are more about relieving parents' anxiety than really bringing useful training to children.
What children should learn to cope with the college entrance examination will be taught in primary schools, junior high schools and senior high schools. Moreover, most of children's grades are not determined by early education institutions, but depend to a greater extent on parents' educational methods and lack of companionship.
If we simply hope to raise children by spending money, then the raised children may be excellent, but they will not become the people we all admire and admire. He is likely to have emotional and moral defects, because he lost himself and humanity at an early age.