I think so, because there is a saying that "at the age of one, you can listen to ancient poems, but at the age of three, you can't speak". I wonder if this questioning parent has heard of it. Many parents give their children all kinds of education since childhood in order to let them learn things, because it is generally believed that the sooner they start to lift the shackles in this respect, the more they can develop their intelligence or ability.

In fact, if you develop your intelligence too early, you may encounter a situation where your baby's stamina is insufficient. To cultivate your baby's learning ability, you must follow the laws of brain development and don't do it blindly. This parent-teacher conference is doing very well. If your baby doesn't want to learn, you don't have to. Don't put pressure on learning too early, it will make the baby grow up, and it will be counterproductive.

Some babies have not fully developed their language skills when they are 1 year old, so it is easy to have the idea of doing early education for their babies, such as reciting Tang poems, telling stories and reading picture books. When the baby is two years old, parents begin to speak English to the baby. Most families let their babies watch some English cartoons or some English picture books, hoping to cultivate their sense of language, but most parents let their babies go to an "English training institution" in advance. Although many training institutions take the route of Happy English, most of them are classroom-style, with the help of games and animations, thinking that this can arouse the baby's interest.

Speaking of English, I suggest that families with conditions take their babies out once to feel the real English without learning and integrating into the environment. Therefore, I want to advise parents who want their children to succeed, mainly to enhance their baby's interest. If the baby really doesn't like it, don't exert pressure.