During the 400-500 years since the publication of Water Margin, some people said it was good, while others said it was bad: saying it was good, emphasizing that Song Jiang's surrender was a "loyalty to the monarch", turning all the "heroes" of Liang Shanbo into heroes, and even changing the title from the original "Biography of Jianghu Vendors" to "Biography of Loyalty in Kyoto" and so on; Say it is not good, but think it turns black and white, touting evil gangsters and bullies as heroes and heroes loyal to the country and friends. Since the Ming Dynasty, the feudal dynasty has repeatedly banned its publication and reading on the grounds of "teaching prostitutes and thieves". Even after the lifting of the ban, there is a saying among the people that "the water margin does not read". Why? Because teenagers have simple ideological understanding and weak ability to judge right and wrong, it is easy to regard the "overbearing" and "arrogance" of some characters in the book as "heroic achievements" to imitate learning, which has a negative impact.