Pay attention to the fate of a tree
Concerned about the fate of a tree, I wonder how many people can agree with this view.
We might as well make an assumption first: if a "forest court" is set up, each of us will become a defendant. Through statements and records, we can make a clear judgment-for example, a large-scale forest fire must reach at least "mu" to be called a disaster. Even a disaster like 1987 Daxinganling forest fire was classified as "extraordinary", but no one can count how many trees were burned. Here, trees are "ignored" as life. Most people think that the primeval forest was left by our ancestors. It's a pity to burn it, just a sigh.
If trees are cut down or burned in nature reserves or arid areas in the west, they should be counted as trees, because the trees in these places are too precious. It is desolate to have mountains without trees, and people long for trees.
In Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, trees are the eyes of the government and people. The most typical example is that cutting down trees will alarm local government officials. When there is smoke on the mountain, the mayor will tell whether the tree is burning. There is a simple reason. Living in Shawozi, people have planted trees for decades and generations, and they have invested too much blood and sweat in the trees, and they have also received obvious results. People cherish trees and rely on them. The "case" is quite clear: "A big family" will loosen up a little, "a small family" will be careful, and "poor households" will not dare to spend their blood easily. From the above statement, we can see that the tree, as a living "life", has been deprived of its survival status in one form or another. And these "criminal" behaviors are precisely the "blind spots" that we humans have not noticed so far.
Everyone should feel guilty about the harm to life, especially the harm to innocent life, including the life of a tree, a grass and a tree and all the micro-worlds. However, in life, when human survival and development are faced with the choice of need and protection, there is artificial inequality in treating the "life" of trees. There are countless such examples, ranging from fires and deforestation to random trampling and unintentional injuries. In the sadness that the leaves are dying, one building after another breaks ground. In winter, when trees are dormant, their foothold becomes a dump for dumping dirty water and garbage. The erosion of oil pollution destroyed some trees before they turned green. ...
For silent trees, people have thousands of reasons to say the necessity of cutting down trees. So, who will do justice for this tree? Moral court? A just court? We don't know. Phenomenologically, some people who set fire to, cut down trees and destroy forests have been punished as they should, but what about the harm people do to trees in daily life? What should people do if they despise or even despise trees in their way of thinking? It is true that this moral court for the survival of trees is still virtual. But in fact, people don't know if they have seen it. The "natural court" has already held a trial and made an irresistible judgment on mankind: the sediment in the Yellow River has been tumbling and stopped several times after repeated flooding; Desertification is advancing constantly, devouring fertile land and the space for human survival; Floods raged and dams were destroyed ... let's not wait for the "natural court" to read us the "death" judgment, then it will be too late.
The floods in the Yangtze River, Nenjiang River and Songhua River have just passed. We should pay more attention to the fate of each tree and start rebuilding our homes while caring about the fate of people.