Why do people consciously distinguish the works of Vae and vincent fang from cool things like thieves going?

A good lyric should consider three aspects. First, it is rhythmic. Good lyrics can grasp the rhythm of the song, make the pause of words, words and sentences just match the rhythm of music, which is not only conducive to breathing and singing, but also pleasant to listen to. Because of the diversity of music today, it is not difficult to do this. Any good song has a sense of rhythm first. Good rain is a counterexample. Sentences are broken in the wrong places, stuck in the wrong places, and it is difficult to hear anti-human organs.

Compared with Vae, vincent fang's ci is more widely circulated, and of course, it is also an achievement with Jay Chou's music. Vincent fang's lyrics seem to have a deliberate pursuit of the rhythm of the text itself or a coincidence of genius. Of course, you can't tell the difference between good and bad, because basically all the lyrics are rhythmic, except those that are messy. "Cool" is there, and so is "thieves will go".

Second, the lyrics are sung. These two lyrics are very popular now. Jay Chou's songs were popular all over the world in those days, and it is impossible to tell good from bad.

Thirdly, the literariness of lyrics. Why does everyone think that these two songs lower the standard of lyrics appreciation? Literariness is not enough or even low, which makes people despise their lyrics while longing for their music.

Vincent fang is good at describing scenes and landscapes when writing lyrics, and expressing emotional ups and downs by shaping visual images. This is a typical technique of "writing scenery and expressing emotion" in poetry. "Smoke billows from the kitchen stove, a thousand miles across the river" and "The night is too long and turns into frost. Who's cold and desperate in the attic? Is it super graphic?

In addition, the image is disassembled and rhetorical devices such as metaphor and part-of-speech metonymy are used flexibly to express a novel but confusing artistic conception. "I warmed a pot of homesickness, drank enough of the past", "The years peeled off on the wall and saw my childhood", so deconstruction is also an important means of writing poetry. And now what about these so-called antique authors? I can only piece together words, thinking about using some ancient words, and the ancient meaning naturally comes. It's okay to fool them about their so-called same frequency and hobbies, because they are equally ignorant (people who don't care about piracy and plagiarism are also polite to use ignorance to describe them), but in the environment where the cultivation of popular literature is generally improved, the shortcomings of these writers' literary level are particularly obvious.

Although Fang Zhouzi's ci has ancient meaning, he can switch freely between ancient meaning and modern artistic conception. "The ancient road outside the fence, I'll take you through. In the years of weeds, even parting is silent. The ancient fenced roads and meadows are full of ancient meanings, but "I will lead you through" and "even parting is silent" immediately become modern expressions and modern images. This shadowless writing naturally allows listeners to successfully receive ancient images through modern vocabulary. This is the level.

To sum up, the songs are pleasant to listen to, and the lyrics and rhythm are highly accepted. At the same time, we can truly appreciate the artistic conception in China's ancient poems, and convey it to the audience through the lyrics, causing everyone's * * * sound. This is a very Chinese song.

It is difficult for lyrical writers who pile up rhetoric to really understand and use the ancient meaning, especially those shallow people who have no aura, only copy and copy, refuse to accept criticism and admit their mistakes.

Why? Because their knowledge about ancient poetry is too superficial, they just stay in words, and they are proud of their ignorance.

I remember someone saying that the author of ancient style is a primary school student.

This "pupil" does not refer to a diploma, but refers to the knowledge of ancient poetry and cultural literacy.