1. Journals: Different academic journals have different review and repair processes. Some journals may take longer to process the review and revision process, while others may make decisions faster. For well-known and prestigious journals, the process of review and repair may be relatively stricter and longer.
2. Fields: Different academic fields have different research and publishing speeds. For example, research in biomedical and engineering fields often takes longer to conduct experiments and publish papers, while papers in social sciences and humanities may be published relatively quickly.
3. Changes: If there are few changes and no major changes are involved, the magazine may make a decision faster. However, if there are many rework or major revisions, the magazine may need more time to evaluate and deal with these revisions.
4. The author's reply time: It will take some time for the author to repair after receiving the review comments. If the author can complete the repair in a short time, the whole process may be faster. However, if the author needs more time to revise and reply to the review comments, the whole process may be slow.
5. Workload of periodical editors: The workload of periodical editors will also affect the result time after repair. If the workload of journal editors is heavy, it may take longer to deal with the review and repair process.
To sum up, the result time after the paper is repaired varies due to many factors. Usually, the result time after repair may be between weeks and months, or even longer. In order to ensure that your paper can be published on time, please leave enough time for rework and waiting for the review results. Maintain good communication and cooperation with periodical editors in the process of restoration, so as to complete the review and publication process as soon as possible.