Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Books and materials - Reading Notes No.2 —— Reading "Education is the Art of Slow"
Reading Notes No.2 —— Reading "Education is the Art of Slow"
The literature teacher mentioned in the speech "Don't steal children's dreams": Can we put aside "vulgar dialectics" in our teaching first, so that students can face the text directly, face life directly and form their own feelings and experiences?

I want to say that this is what Liu Qian taught the big fish. There is no preaching in class, and there is no so-called class analysis. Teacher Liu relies entirely on the students' own feelings to interpret, how much they realize and understand. The classroom is a whole, and all the understanding and interpretation add up to a considerable amount. Everyone's close reading constitutes a complete text interpretation, which together constitutes a complete classroom.

Teacher Zhang said that "education needs to think about big problems, and education also needs to continue to work patiently on small things."

This means that education should not only look up at the starry sky, but also have a long-term vision and a blueprint for the future, and it should also have down-to-earth practice and dedication. Education should not be arrogant, let alone extravagant. Education does not need superficial excitement, but should do every little thing related to education, students and teachers, thoroughly solve every problem related to it, do concrete things for specific people and do every little thing well.

Teacher Zhang said in the speech "Listening to the class with his father's mood": We need to reflect on the classroom of "the operation itself succeeded, but the patient died", and return to the real, concrete and changeable classroom from the infatuation with speed. This is the real beginning of teaching.

I've seen and taken such a class. It is a supercilious classroom that only aims at completing tasks, a classroom that only asks about the progress of teaching without asking about students' life and death, and a classroom that completes teachers' unilateral teaching without asking about students' learning. This class is actually an anti-education class. There may be interaction in class, but it can only be shared in the direction indicated by the teacher. There is no student's mind, or there, the student's mind can't go beyond the boundaries set by the teacher, otherwise it is a foul and will be "killed with a stick." How can such a class be "free spirit and independent thinking"? I'm deeply sorry. I shouldn't have. In the future, I will allow students to "talk nonsense" in class, allow and encourage them to have their own opinions, publicize their independent thinking personality, guide him with the brilliance of maternal love, and watch his progress with appreciation. Don't criticize, glare or abuse, because equality, freedom, respect and love must be rooted in teachers' hearts.

At the crossroads of education, Teacher Zhang said: Not only in the classroom, but every inch of space after class is full of teaching intervention.

Teacher Zhang said that he had made an investigation, and as a front-line teacher, he knew this more personally. Not to mention it's not like this in class. Ten minutes before class, students climb the pole, and the leader will say it is not because of danger. When students go running, the leader will say no because they will fall. After the rain, there was water in the playground. Students wear rain boots to walk and play in the water. The leader said it wouldn't work, because it would get the shoes wet. Doing broadcast gymnastics in the playground on a hot day, I found that several people didn't wear red scarves. The leader said that won't do. I must stand and be punished to see if you dare to wear a red scarf in the future. It's neither this nor that. Over time, our students become sheep, obedient and indecisive, and don't know what else to do except obey the teacher. Bound by action, they lost their vitality and became bored. How can students like schools and teachers? Of course, over time, he can only like the teachers in this school, because he doesn't know what to do without the so-called "guidance" of the teacher.

Teacher Zhang said: When you make a mistake for the first time or just now, timely and appropriate education is the most effective.

I feel the same way about this sentence. Children are extremely malleable. When he still doesn't know right or wrong, it is necessary for us as adults to point it out in time and give an appropriate sermon. We all have this experience. Children who just learn to write are likely to write in an inappropriate way. Teachers' immediate demonstration and correction can bring life-long benefits to children. Pointing out a typo in time may also save him from making mistakes for 30 to 40 years or even a lifetime. For example, the word "Kao" in "Kao" was wrongly written for at least 30 years because the word "He" removed from the word "One" in primary school was written in the second half. In fact, timely education is also an education in which life is present, which is easily accepted by students and gets twice the result with half the effort.

Teacher Zhang said in Walking in the Backlight: Curiosity about the world, open acceptance, understanding of * * * and infinite enthusiasm for the unknown are all shaping our inner appearance, and a person may be more like himself after all.

American President Lincoln has a famous saying: "A person should be responsible for his appearance when he is forty years old." And your culture, knowledge, self-cultivation, inner contradictions, and the degree of reconciliation with yourself will be reflected in a person's actions and language, and will be presented on the outside. Speaking of this, I can't help but mention the sentence "My mind is full of poems and books", and so is "I am born from my heart". Teacher Zhang talks more about shaping his mind and influencing his behavior, language, manners and so on from the inside out. When your words and deeds are consistent, it will be your own image or appearance.

In the speech "How should we be a primary school teacher today", Teacher Zhang quoted a sentence from the famous Japanese philosopher Daisaku Ikeda: No matter how successful a person is, if he doesn't meet a good teacher, his life will be at a loss. He also quoted Suhomlinski, a famous educator in the former Soviet Union, as saying: If a person doesn't meet a good teacher, he may be a potential criminal. A person can meet a good teacher, and it can't be worse.

Teacher Zhang said this to our professional teacher, which obviously exaggerated the role of teachers. The purpose is to cheer up the teachers. I hope that teachers should not despise their profession, have a sense of mission, have a sense of professional honor, and have good intentions. My understanding is that the teacher mentioned by the above two masters is not only a teacher, but also a person who can lay his own life background and imprint his own soul on the road of life. Of course, he may also be a teacher in class. Just like colleagues who took part in the education walk, from now on, the direction of our efforts for the rest of our lives is likely to be adjusted. We may no longer pay attention to grades, but we may pay more attention to life and growth, and pay attention to every specific person and their every tiny change. Then we will really become such teachers, so that we can really give full play to the power of education.