event
65438124 October, two teenagers accidentally fell into the water in Baotawan, Jingzhou, Hubei. In order to rescue the teenagers who fell into the water, more than 0 college students from Hubei Yangtze University/KLOC-0 jumped into the river hand in hand, 2 teenagers were rescued and 3 college students were killed. Just as people sighed for the courageous people, a piece of news made the whole incident develop in another direction.
A college student who participated in the rescue told the media: "A mechanical fishing boat was parked where two teenagers fell into the water less than 5 meters. Our classmates knelt in front of the owner of the fishing boat and asked them to see if they could rescue Zhao Fang and three other people. The boss said, when there are no dead people on the Yangtze River, how can few dead people make money? If you don't save people, you will take bodies, 12,000 per person during the day and 18,000 at night, and you will take people in one hand ... "After media investigation, it was found that there was a local folk salvage team that made huge profits by fishing for bodies. It caused public anger for a time.
click
This event used to be the news with the highest click-through rate on the internet, but now it still looks mixed. Three 19 college students gave their young lives to save the drowning boy. They saved not only two teenagers, but also the degenerating social morality. The indifference and mercenary nature of the body snatcher not only aroused people's anger, but also aroused the public's yearning for good morality. I hope that after this incident, the similar "asking for money at home" will disappear, and then more and more people will lend a helping hand when others ask for help.
Two: Yu's "fraudulent donation"
event
In a blog post, the editor of Jinghua Literature magazine questioned Yu's claim to donate 200,000 yuan to the Wenchuan earthquake-stricken area, saying that he finally failed to fulfill his promise and the actual donation did not exceed 60,000 yuan. Subsequently, Yi Zhongtian sent three blog posts to question Yu's moral standards. A stone stirred up a thousand waves and was criticized by all parties in China.
A few days later, Yu responded to the "fraudulent donation" incident for the first time, saying that "they are talking nonsense" and said, "Just after the earthquake, I decided to donate 200,000 yuan to run a Hope Primary School, but the leaders of the Education Bureau in the disaster area suggested that I donate three libraries instead, and I choose books myself. So I spent 200,000 on books and another 300,000 on library equipment. All three libraries were completed in September this year 1. " However, some people still question that the nature of the surplus donation is different from that of donating money to build a library and donating books, and it has been widely publicized before all this is fulfilled. Is it a "fraudulent donation"?
click
Who says that charity marketing is a corporate behavior, and individuals can do it well? According to insiders, some cultural stars are now cooperating with commercial companies to donate money. Donors are cultural stars, but commercial companies come forward and the money is also paid by commercial companies. In this way, celebrities become famous and businessmen advertise; Then, the company exchanged the names of celebrities for money, and celebrities exchanged the company's money for names. This kind of "charity marketing" is definitely more brilliant. Back to the war of words about fraudulent donation in Autumn Rain, in fact, donating more and donating less is a personal wish, and how much can't be used to measure the size of love. But it is not a master's demeanor to make personal propaganda under the banner of charity. The public's constant questioning has forced out a series of insider information. No matter what the initial idea is, whether the final promised donation is in place is the ultimate goal of people's questioning. Yu's "Cheating Donation" just shows us one of the stories related to these two words in the public welfare boom.