The structured interview of public institutions is composed of multiple elements, and the scoring standard is determined accordingly.

(a) the proposed job matching? Main points of assessment

Investigate the matching degree between the candidate's knowledge, experience, personality, achievements and the proposed position.

Reference example

Please briefly introduce your work (study) experience.

Q:

1. How did you know about the exam? What preparations did you make before the exam?

Do you have confidence in this exam? Why?

Scoring reference

Good: The knowledge, experience and achievements you have are conducive to quickly adapting to the proposed position.

China people: My knowledge and experience are basically suitable for this position.

Poor: knowledge and related experience are far from the job requirements, and the adaptability and related quality are poor.

(B) Comprehensive analysis ability evaluation points

1, the degree of concern for major and hot issues in social life and the basic theoretical literacy shown by such issues.

2. Comprehensive judgment and analysis ability.

3. The level of policy theory.

Reference example

Today's newspapers have changed from traditional leaflets to stacks. The more newspapers are run, the thicker they are, and the more radio and television channels are opened, the longer they will last. Although this can make people get more information, it may also lead to the decline of information quality, information flooding and even pollution. What do you think of this?

Tips and questions:

1. What information do you think is useful to you? Why?

2. In the case of multiple sources of information, what principles do you follow to obtain and analyze information? When do you think information is credible and when it is not? Why?

Scoring reference

Good: can comprehensively analyze the role of information in the information society and its dialectical relationship with human development. The problem is thought widely, discussed deeply and reasoned thoroughly.

English: able to analyze problems comprehensively and reason logically.

Poor: narrow-minded, confused, and lack of basis for considering problems.

(C) planning, organizational capacity assessment points

1, organizing the planning and feasibility of specific activities.

2, organizational management ability (coordination ability, working methods, etc.). )

Reference example

In order to further strengthen the leadership of the Party and enrich the ranks of party member, the organization decided to strengthen the development of party member among the youth and entrusted you with this task. How do you plan to carry out your work?

Tip: Suggestions can be made from the relevant documents of the Party and the specific situation of young people.

Q:

1. What do you think is the key to developing young party member?

2. What methods can you think of to improve young people's participation enthusiasm?

Scoring reference

Good: have a comprehensive understanding of the situation, and be able to make practical plans, well-arranged, organized, know the priorities, and be good at organizing, coordinating and authorizing.

Chinese: The whole plan is basically reasonable and feasible, and it has certain ability of organization, coordination and authorization.

Poor: unable to grasp the key points, lack of feasibility, lack of organization and coordination ability and lack of authorization.

(D) Evaluation points of interpersonal coordination ability

1, interpersonal value tendency.

2. Communication skills and sense of cooperation.

3. Work coordination ability and art.

Reference example

A very good friend borrowed money from you. You have money, but you are more willing to invest it in a project, but you are afraid of affecting your friendship. How will you handle this matter?

Tip: When the friendship between friends conflicts with personal interests, you can get tips on how to find the combination point.

Q:

1. Your friend's face turned sour when you politely refused. What's your reaction?

2. When refusing a friend's request, what do you usually think is the appropriate way to deal with it?

Scoring reference?

Good: We can adopt different communication methods according to different people's characteristics and different interpersonal environments, properly solve interpersonal conflicts and consider the overall situation and long-term factors. The answer is basically true.

English: I can also consider dealing with different people and things in different ways, and my skills in dealing with interpersonal problems are average. ?

Poor: the way to deal with problems is negative and single, lacking skills and unable to effectively solve interpersonal contradictions.

(V) Key points of emergency capability assessment

1. Be quick to respond to things.

2. Emotional stability, rationality and thoroughness when dealing with emergencies.

3, in the face of work form, environmental compliance.

Reference example

If you host a variety show on the spot, you just announced that the next show will be a violin solo, but suddenly there are some acrobatic puppies jumping on the stage, how will you react?

Tip: First, you should calm down, and then think of something that can calm the audience's surprise and dissatisfaction.

Q:

1, can you come up with several solutions to this problem at once?

2. What will you do if you don't handle it properly for a while and cause the audience to boo?

Scoring reference

Good: when answering, you are emotionally stable and quick-thinking, and the envisaged countermeasures are appropriate and feasible.

English: When answering, the mood is basically stable, and the response is basically decent and feasible.

Poor: I was at a loss when answering, and the response was improper, and the countermeasures were not feasible.

?

(6) Language expression ability

What are the evaluation points?

1. Accuracy, organization and fluency of language. ?

2. The descriptive ability, appeal and persuasiveness of language. ?

Note: There is no separate question in this part. The examiner will score according to the evaluation score according to the actual performance of the candidates when answering all the above questions, combined with the actual performance of the candidates when answering all the above questions.

(7) manners? What are the evaluation points? 1, cultural literacy. ?

2. Physical appearance and dress. ?

3. Physical condition (physical strength and energy)?

Scoring description: The examiner scores the candidates according to the evaluation points and the observation of the candidates.

What is the principle of high score in interview? 1, in order?

Concise and coherent answers show that you have clear thinking and strong generalization and logical thinking ability, which is one of the principles for the judges to score high. ?

2. Sincere and frank?

To reply sincerely and frankly, first, tell your own personality characteristics, especially your own shortcomings and deficiencies, and don't hide them. Second, praise the advantages of others from the heart, and don't slander others in order to express yourself or highlight yourself. The third is to dare to express their views and opinions boldly, not afraid of sound and color, and not hesitate. Fourth, dare to criticize some bad social atmosphere, do not whitewash peace, and do not deliberately avoid it. ?

3. be full of emotions?

To be full of emotion in the defense, candidates should have a passion for life and an optimistic attitude. The second is to be confident. A person who has no self-confidence will be nervous and slow-thinking when sitting on the defense table, and naturally he can't say anything interesting. The third is to create a situation with emotion and sound. In the defense, you should be good at starting with real-life examples or personal subjective feelings, putting facts and reasoning, striving for rationality and sensibility, so that the judges have a strong voice and let them look at your eyes from examination to appreciation, from judgment to recognition. ?

4. Be original?

Teacher Hua Zhi thinks the following methods are worth learning: First, quote famous sayings, proverbs, jingles or buzzwords appropriately to demonstrate or expound his own views. Second, it can be expressed by visual metaphor, personification or imposition of parallelism. Third, you can use accurate figures, obscure but meaningful anecdotes or classic historical allusions to supplement and sublimate your own views.